Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32868448›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2020

Plant expression of NifD protein variants resistant to mitochondrial degradation.

Robert S Allen, Christina M Gregg, Shoko Okada, Amratha Menon, Dawar Hussain, Vanessa Gillespie, Ema Johnston, Rosangela Devilla, Andrew C Warden, Matthew Taylor and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Organelle-dependent polyprotein designs enable stoichiometric expression of nitrogen fixation components targeted to mitochondria.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Robert S AllenAgriculture and Food, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Acton, Canberra, ACT 2600, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2994-2996
Christina M GreggAgriculture and Food, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Acton, Canberra, ACT 2600, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4440-4624
Shoko OkadaLand and Water, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Acton, Canberra, ACT 2600, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1759-2677
Amratha MenonAgriculture and Food, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Acton, Canberra, ACT 2600, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0112-4254
Dawar HussainAgriculture and Food, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Acton, Canberra, ACT 2600, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5472-7956
Vanessa GillespieAgriculture and Food, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Acton, Canberra, ACT 2600, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6562-0823
Ema JohnstonAgriculture and Food, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Acton, Canberra, ACT 2600, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1943-045X
Rosangela DevillaAgriculture and Food, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Acton, Canberra, ACT 2600, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2356-5891
Andrew C WardenLand and Water, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Acton, Canberra, ACT 2600, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2683-9798
Matthew TaylorLand and Water, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Acton, Canberra, ACT 2600, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9576-1555
Keren ByrneAgriculture and Food, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Queensland Biosciences Precinct, St. Lucia, Brisbane, QLD 4067, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4759-0645
Michelle ColgraveAgriculture and Food, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Queensland Biosciences Precinct, St. Lucia, Brisbane, QLD 4067, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8463-805X
Craig C WoodAgriculture and Food, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Acton, Canberra, ACT 2600, Australia; craig.wood@csiro.au.ORCID 0000-0002-6425-0434
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To engineer Mo-dependent nitrogenase function in plants, expression of the structural proteins NifD and NifK will be an absolute requirement. Although mitochondria have been established as a suitable eukaryotic environment for biosynthesis of oxygen-sensitive enzymes such as NifH, expression of NifD in this organelle has proven difficult due to cryptic NifD degradation. Here, we describe a solution to this problem. Using molecular and proteomic methods, we found NifD degradation to be a consequence of mitochondrial endoprotease activity at a specific motif within NifD. Focusing on this functionally sensitive region, we designed NifD variants comprising between one and three amino acid substitutions and distinguished several that were resistant to degradation when expressed in both plant and yeast mitochondria. Nitrogenase activity assays of these resistant variants in

Indexed as

Amino Acid SubstitutionEscherichia coliGenes, BacterialMitochondriaNitrogenaseNitrogen FixationPlant ProteinsPlantsPolyproteinsProteomicsNitrogenasePlant ProteinsPolyproteinsmetabolic engineeringmitochondrianitrogenaseprotein engineeringsynthetic biology

Identifiers

PMID32868448
PMCPMC7502725
OpenAlexW3082139046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.