ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2020
Protecting memory from misinformation: Warnings modulate cortical reinstatement during memory retrieval.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- The dilemma of trauma-focused therapy: effects of imagery rescripting on voluntary memory.Psychological research · 2023Trial
- Shared memories of event details in the human brain are altered by misinformation and test expectations.PLoS biology · 2026Article
- Warning people about the risk of AI error mitigates human acquisition of AI bias.Cognitive research: principles and implications · 2026Article
- Examining the impact of warnings on eyewitness memory.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Not the same as it ever was: A review of memory modification, updating, and distortion in humans and rodents.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2025Review
- Engagement With and Use of Health Information on Social Media Among US Latino Individuals: National Cross-Sectional Survey Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Timing of pre-retrieval warnings matters in reducing memory errors in a repeated testing misinformation study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Intrinsic functional connectivity in medial temporal lobe networks is associated with susceptibility to misinformation.Memory (Hove, England) · 2024Article
- Warning before misinformation exposure modulates memory encoding.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2024Article
- The impact of misinformation presented during jury deliberation on juror memory and decision-making.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Article
- Cross-stage neural pattern similarity in the hippocampus predicts false memory derived from post-event inaccurate information.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Are witnesses able to avoid highly accessible misinformation? Examining the efficacy of different warnings for high and low accessibility postevent misinformation.Memory & cognition · 2022Article
- False memories activate distinct brain regions in females and males.Neuroimage. Reports · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Exposure to even subtle forms of misleading information can significantly alter memory for past events. Memory distortion due to misinformation has been linked to faulty reconstructive processes during memory retrieval and the reactivation of brain regions involved in the initial encoding of misleading details (cortical reinstatement). The current study investigated whether warning participants about the threat of misinformation can modulate cortical reinstatement during memory retrieval and reduce misinformation errors. Participants watched a silent video depicting a crime (original event) and were given an initial test of memory for the crime details. Then, participants listened to an auditory narrative describing the crime in which some original details were altered (misinformation). Importantly, participants who received a warning about the reliability of the auditory narrative either before or after exposure to misinformation demonstrated less susceptibility to misinformation on a final test of memory compared to unwarned participants. Warned and unwarned participants also demonstrated striking differences in neural activity during the final memory test. Compared to participants who did not receive a warning, participants who received a warning (regardless of its timing) demonstrated increased activity in visual regions associated with the original source of information as well as decreased activity in auditory regions associated with the misleading source of information. Stronger visual reactivation was associated with reduced susceptibility to misinformation, whereas stronger auditory reactivation was associated with increased susceptibility to misinformation. Together, these results suggest that a simple warning can modulate reconstructive processes during memory retrieval and reduce memory errors due to misinformation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.