Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32867999›Full record

ArticlePoultry science2020

Staphylococci in poultry intestines: a comparison between farmed and household chickens.

Muhammad Ali Syed, Hakim Ullah, Sadia Tabassum, Bushra Fatima, Tiffanie A Woodley, Hazem Ramadan, Charlene R Jackson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Poultry science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Antimicrobial Susceptibility Profiles of CommensalAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review on skeletal disorders caused byThe veterinary quarterly · 2022
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria-A Review.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. AdultMicroorganisms · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Muhammad Ali SyedDepartment of Microbiology, The University of Haripur, Haripur, Pakistan.
Hakim UllahDepartment of Zoology, Hazara University, Mansehra, Pakistan.
Sadia TabassumDepartment of Zoology, Hazara University, Mansehra, Pakistan.
Bushra FatimaDepartment of Microbiology, The University of Haripur, Haripur, Pakistan.
Tiffanie A WoodleyBacterial Epidemiology and Antimicrobial Resistance Research Unit, USDA-ARS, U.S. National Poultry Research Center, Athens, GA.
Hazem RamadanHygiene and Zoonoses Department, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
Charlene R JacksonBacterial Epidemiology and Antimicrobial Resistance Research Unit, USDA-ARS, U.S. National Poultry Research Center, Athens, GA. Electronic address: Charlene.Jackson@ars.usda.gov.
Hazara University · PKUniversity of Haripur · PKU.S. National Poultry Research Center · USMansoura University · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Both pathogenic as well as nonpathogenic species of staphylococci have been reported in poultry, but these studies have not compared staphylococcal flora of both farmed and household broiler chickens. Staphylococci from farmed (n = 51) and household chicken intestines (n = 43) were isolated and tested for resistance to antimicrobials, presence of resistance genes, and inhibitory activity against other bacteria; correlation of resistance phenotype and genotype was also evaluated. At least 12 staphylococcal species were identified; Staphylococcus carnosus subspecies carnosus was the predominant species from both sources. Most farmed chicken staphylococci were resistant to tigecycline (38/51; 74.8%) while the highest level of resistance among the household chicken staphylococci was to clindamycin (31/43; 72.1%). The mecA gene was only detected in staphylococci from household chickens, whereas ermC and tetK or tetM were found in staphylococci from both groups of birds. Multidrug resistance (resistance ≥ 2 antimicrobial classes) was observed in 88% of resistant staphylococci ranging from 2 to 8 classes and up to 10 antimicrobials. Isolates produced inhibitory activity against 7 clinical bacterial strains primarily Enterococcus faecalis (25/88; 28.4%) and Escherichia coli (22/88; 25%). This study demonstrated that the staphylococcal population among farmed and household chickens varies by species and resistance to antimicrobials. These results may reflect the influence of the environment or habitat of each bird type on the intestinal microflora. As resistance in the staphylococci to antimicrobials used to treat human infections was detected, further study is warranted to determine strategies to prevent transfer of these resistant populations to humans via contamination of the poultry meat.

Indexed as

ChickensIntestinesStaphylococcusAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsDrug Resistance, BacterialGenes, BacterialMicrobial Sensitivity TestsAnti-Bacterial Agentsantibiotic resistancebroiler chickennormal florastaphylococcus

Identifiers

PMID32867999
PMCPMC7598113
OpenAlexW3037898549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.