Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32867971›Full record

ArticlePoultry science2020

Differential immunomodulatory effect of vitamin D (1,25 (OH)

J Jaime, D S Vargas-Bermúdez, A Yitbarek, J Reyes, J C Rodríguez-Lecompte

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Poultry science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Further Evaluation of 1,25(OH)Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  2. Oral vitamin DPoultry science · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The Immunomodulatory Properties of Vitamin D.Mediterranean journal of rheumatology · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

J JaimeUniversidad Nacional de Colombia, sede Bogotá. Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y de Zootecnia. Departamento de Salud Animal. Centro de Investigación en Inmunología e Infectología Veterinaria (CI(3)V), Bogotá CP 11001, Colombia.
D S Vargas-BermúdezUniversidad Nacional de Colombia, sede Bogotá. Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y de Zootecnia. Departamento de Salud Animal. Centro de Investigación en Inmunología e Infectología Veterinaria (CI(3)V), Bogotá CP 11001, Colombia.
A YitbarekDepartment of Pathobiology, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph N1G 2W1, ON, Canada.
J ReyesGrupo de investigacion Biogenesis, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia.
J C Rodríguez-LecompteDepartment of Pathology and Microbiology, Atlantic Veterinary College, University of Prince Edward Island, Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, Canada, C1A 4P3. Electronic address: jrodriguez@upei.ca.
Universidad de Antioquia · COUniversity of Guelph · CAUniversity of Prince Edward Island · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It has been demonstrated that vitamin D (Vit D) included in diets offers a beneficial effect by improving innate immune responses in chickens. However, its mechanisms of action and the effect on immunosuppressive pathogens, such as infectious bursal disease virus, are not yet known. In the present study, we have studied the immunomodulatory effect of Vit D on the innate immune response in 3 cell lines: fibroblast cells (DF-1), macrophages (HD11), and B cells (DT-40) infected with IBDV (intermediate vaccine) at 2 multiplicity of infections (MOI) (1 and 0.1). Genes associated with innate immune responses (TLR-3, TLR-21, MDA-5, MyD88, TRIF, IRF-7, INF-α, INF-β, PKR, OAS, viperin, IL-1β, IL-6, and IL-12) were evaluated at different time points (3, 6, 12, 24, and 36 h after infection, h.p.i). Virus production reached a maximum at 24 h.p.i., which was significantly (P < 0.05) higher in DF-1 cells, followed by HD-11 and DT-40 cells. Mainly in HD-11 cells, there was a significant (P < 0.05) effect of Vit D supplementation on receptors TLR-3, TLR-21, and MDA-5 after 12 h.p.i, independent of MOI. DT-40 cells showed the highest antiviral activity, with a significant (P < 0.05) effect on IRF-7, IFN-β, OAS, and PKR gene expression, where expression of IRF-7 and IFN-β correlated positively with Vit D supplementation, while OAS and PKR were independent of Vit D. Proinflammatory cytokines were significantly (P < 0.05) upregulated and found to be Vit D and MOI dependent. In conclusion, this study demonstrated the capacity of IBDV to trigger a strong innate immune response in chicken cells and contributes to the understanding of the activation pathways of innate immunity induced by IBDV and further shows the benefitial effect of Vit D supplementation as an immunomodulator.

Indexed as

Birnaviridae InfectionsImmunity, InnateInfectious bursal disease virusPoultry DiseasesVitamin DAnimalsCell LineChickensImmunologic FactorsIn Vitro TechniquesImmunologic FactorsVitamin DB cellIBDVinnate immunitymacrophagevitamin D

Identifiers

PMID32867971
PMCPMC7598002
OpenAlexW3036341407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.