ArticleEpidemiology and infection2020
Epidemiology of Enterotoxigenic
Article in Epidemiology and infection, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Epidemiology of Single-Etiology Non-Shiga Toxin-ProducingFood protection trends · 2026Article
- One Health Perspective on the EnterotoxigenicMicroorganisms · 2026Review
- Characterization and phage-antibiotic synergy of bacteriophages PES-1 and PES-2 against porcine enterotoxigenicFrontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Characterization of a novel Jumbo phage JP4 with potential to control pathogenic Escherichia coli.Virology journal · 2025Article
- Molecular Characterisation of Escherichia coli Collected From an Urban River in Johannesburg, South Africa.Environmental microbiology reports · 2025Article
- Surveillance of genomic diversity and antimicrobial resistance in enterotoxigenicJournal of medical microbiology · 2025Article
- Enhancing oxacillin efficacy against planktonic and biofilms of foodborne Enterobacteriaceae by hylin-a1-derived peptide.Future medicinal chemistry · 2025Article
- Review
- Antibiotic resistance and preventive strategies in foodborne pathogenic bacteria: a comprehensive review.Food science and biotechnology · 2025Review
- Virulence genes and phylogenetic analysis of antibiotic-resistantVeterinary world · 2025Article
- Seroprevalence Study of Conserved EnterotoxigenicMicroorganisms · 2023Article
- In Vitro Effect on Piglet Gut Microbiota and In Vivo Assessment of Newly Isolated Bacteriophages against F18 EnterotoxigenicViruses · 2023Article
- Microbial lectome versus host glycolipidome: How pathogens exploit glycosphingolipids to invade, dupe or kill.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Review
- Emerging Themes in the Molecular Pathogenesis of Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli.The Journal of infectious diseases · 2021Article
- Multidrug resistance, biofilm formation, and virulence genes ofVeterinary world · 2021Article
- Virulence Factors of Enteric PathogenicInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Acute Bacterial Gastroenteritis.Gastroenterology clinics of North America · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) is a well-established cause of traveller's diarrhoea and occasional domestic foodborne illness outbreaks in the USA. Although ETEC are not detected by conventional stool culture methods used in clinical laboratories, syndromic culture-independent diagnostic tests (CIDTs) capable of detecting ETEC have become increasingly prevalent in the last decade. This study describes the epidemiology of ETEC infections reported to the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) during 2016-2017. ETEC-positive stool specimens were submitted to MDH to confirm the presence of ETEC DNA by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Cases were interviewed to ascertain illness and exposures. Contemporaneous Salmonella cases were used as a comparison group in a case-case comparison analysis of risk factors. Of 222 ETEC-positive specimens received by MDH, 108 (49%) were concordant by PCR. ETEC was the sixth most frequently reported bacterial enteric pathogen among a subset of CIDT-positive specimens. Sixty-nine (64%) laboratory-confirmed cases had an additional pathogen codetected with ETEC, including enteroaggregative E. coli (n = 40) and enteropathogenic E. coli (n = 39). Although travel is a risk factor for ETEC infection, only 43% of cases travelled internationally, providing evidence for ETEC as an underestimated source of domestically acquired enteric illness in the USA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.