Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32867712›Full record

ArticleBMC ophthalmology2020

Influence of electromagnetic radiation emitted by daily-use electronic devices on the Eyemate® system in-vitro: a feasibility study.

Azzurra Invernizzi, Shereif Haykal, Valeria Lo Faro, Vincenzo Pennisi, Lars Choritz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Azzurra InvernizziLaboratory for Experimental Ophthalmology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, P.O.Box 30.001, 9700, Groningen, RB, Netherlands. a.invernizzi@umcg.nl.
Shereif HaykalLaboratory for Experimental Ophthalmology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, P.O.Box 30.001, 9700, Groningen, RB, Netherlands.
Valeria Lo FaroLaboratory for Experimental Ophthalmology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, P.O.Box 30.001, 9700, Groningen, RB, Netherlands.
Vincenzo PennisiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Lars ChoritzDepartment of Ophthalmology, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany. lars.choritz@med.ovgu.de.

Funding

H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions 661883H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions 675033
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEyemate® is a system for the continual monitoring of intraocular pressure (IOP), composed of an intraocular sensor, and a hand-held reader device. As the eyemate®-IO sensor communicates with the hand-held reader telemetrically, some patients might fear that the electronic devices that they use on a daily basis might somehow interfere with this communication, leading to unreliable measurements of IOP. In this study, we investigated the effect of electromagnetic radiation produced by a number of everyday electronic devices on the measurements made by an eyemate®-IO sensor in-vitro, in an artificial and controlled environment.

methodsThe eyemate®-IO sensor was suspended in a sterile 0.9% sodium chloride solution and placed in a water bath at 37 °C. The antenna, connected to a laptop for recording the data, was positioned at a fixed distance of 1 cm from the sensor. Approximately 2 hrs of "quasi-continuous" measurements were recorded for the baseline and for a cordless phone, a smart-phone and a laptop. Repeated measures ANOVA was used to compare any possible differences between the baseline and the tested devices.

resultsFor baseline measurements, the sensor maintained a steady-state, resulting in a flat profile at a mean pressure reading of 0.795 ± 0.45 hPa, with no apparent drift. No statistically significant difference (p = 0.332) was found between the fluctuations in the baseline and the tested devices (phone: 0.76 ± 0.41 hPa; cordless: 0.787 ± 0.26 hPa; laptop: 0.775 ± 0.39 hPa).

conclusionIn our in-vitro environment, we found no evidence of signal drifts or fluctuations associated with the tested devices, thus showing a lack of electromagnetic interference with data transmission in the tested frequency ranges.

Indexed as

Intraocular PressureTonometry, OcularElectromagnetic RadiationElectronicsFeasibility StudiesHumansElectromagnetic radiationEyemate® systemGlaucomaIntraocular pressureTelemetry

Identifiers

PMID32867712
PMCPMC7461327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.