Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32867709›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2020

Raised CA19-9 and CEA have prognostic relevance in gallbladder carcinoma.

Ashish Sachan, Sundeep Singh Saluja, Phani Kumar Nekarakanti, Nimisha, Bhawna Mahajan, Hirdaya H Nag, Pramod K Mishra

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ashish SachanDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Govind Ballabh Pant Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research, Room no 218, Jawahar Lal Nehru Marg, New Delhi, 110002, India.
Sundeep Singh SalujaDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Govind Ballabh Pant Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research, Room no 218, Jawahar Lal Nehru Marg, New Delhi, 110002, India. sundeepsaluja@yahoo.co.in.
Phani Kumar NekarakantiDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Govind Ballabh Pant Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research, Room no 218, Jawahar Lal Nehru Marg, New Delhi, 110002, India.
NimishaDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Govind Ballabh Pant Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research, Room no 218, Jawahar Lal Nehru Marg, New Delhi, 110002, India.
Bhawna MahajanDepartment of Biochemistry, Govind Ballabh Pant Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research, New Delhi, India.
Hirdaya H NagDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Govind Ballabh Pant Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research, Room no 218, Jawahar Lal Nehru Marg, New Delhi, 110002, India.
Pramod K MishraDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Govind Ballabh Pant Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research, Room no 218, Jawahar Lal Nehru Marg, New Delhi, 110002, India.
Govind Ballabh Pant Hospital · INInstitute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRole of tumor markers in gall bladder carcinoma (GBC) is not well established. We evaluated the prognostic value of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) and carcinoma embryonic antigen (CEA) in patients with GBC.

methodsOf the 225 patients of GBC enrolled,176 patients were included in the study (excluded 49 patients with jaundice). Patients were divided into 3 groups; resectable n = 92, unresectable n = 17, metastatic n = 67. The clinico-pathological characteristics, tumor markers and survival data were analysed. The cutoff values of CA19-9 & CEA for predicting metastases were computed using receiver operating characteristic curve. Kaplan Meir survival and Cox regression analysis were done for factors predicting survival and recurrence.

resultsThe median value of Ca19-9 was significantly higher in metastatic group [resectable: 21.3, unresectable: 53.9 and metastatic: 79; p < 0.001] but not for CEA [3.5, 7.8 and 5 ng/ml (p = 0.20)]. A cutoff value of 72 IU/ml for CA19-9, 5 ng/ml for CEA had a sensitivity and specificity of 52 and 80%, 51 and 72% respectively for detection of metastatic disease. Median, 3-year & 5-year survival were significantly lower in patients with CEA > 4 (p = 0.041), Ca19.9 > 37 (p = 0.019), T3/T4 (p = 0.001), node positive (p = 0.001) and presence of perineural invasion (p = 0.001). However, on multivariate analysis, only Ca19.9 > 37 predicted recurrence (p = 0.002, HR 5.8).

conclusionsRaised CA19.9 and CEA predict metastatic disease in patients with GBC without jaundice with a high specificity and may help in prognostication of the patient. CA19-9 was better than CEA in prediction of tumor burden and in predicting recurrence.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntigens, Tumor-Associated, CarbohydrateCarcinoembryonic AntigenFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGallbladder NeoplasmsHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPrognosisProspective StudiesAntigens, Tumor-Associated, Carbohydratecarbohydrate antigen 199, humanCarcinoembryonic AntigenBiliary cancerCA19–9CEAGall bladder cancerRadical cholecystectomy

Identifiers

PMID32867709
PMCPMC7457344
OpenAlexW3082512507

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.