Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32867707›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2020

Clinical benefit of immune checkpoint inhibitors approved by US Food and Drug Administration.

Fei Liang, Sheng Zhang, Qin Wang, Wenfeng Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Fei LiangMedical Oncology, Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, 270 Dongan Road, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Sheng ZhangMedical Oncology, Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, 270 Dongan Road, Shanghai, 200032, China. wozhangsheng@hotmail.com.
Qin WangShanghai University of Engineering Science, Shanghai, China. 2817403929@qq.com.
Wenfeng LiDepartment of Medical oncology, the affiliated hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China. li_wenfeng@126.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe describe the clinical benefit of immune checkpoint inhibitors using the European Society for Medical Oncology Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (ESMO-MCBS) and ASCO VF.

methodsWe identify all approved indications of immune checkpoint inhibitors based on RCTs between January 1, 2011 and September 30, 2018 by FDA. Information including medians and HR of OS (PFS or DFS) and 95% CI, grade 3 or 4 toxicities in each arm, QOL data, survival probability at fixed time were extracted.

resultsImmune checkpoint inhibitors were approved for 18 indications based on RCTs. All the indications meet the ESMO-MCBS 1.1 threshold for meaningful benefit. By the updated ASCO-VF, the median Net Health Benefit (NHB) of these agents was 55.3 (range 17.4-77.1). Two third of the indication gained the bonus points for durable survival benefits by updated ASCO VF. When updated results were incorporated in the assessment, clinical benefit of most approved immune checkpoint inhibitors increased with a median improvement of NHB of 10 (range 2-20).

conclusionsApproved immune checkpoint inhibitors provided clinical meaningful benefit by ESMO-MCBS 1.1, and most of these agents reach the threshold for bonus points for durable survival in the updated ASCO VF.

Indexed as

Drug ApprovalQuality of LifeUnited States Food and Drug AdministrationAntineoplastic AgentsHumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsKaplan-Meier EstimateNeoplasmsPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresProgression-Free SurvivalRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSocieties, MedicalUnited StatesAntineoplastic AgentsImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsCancerClinical benefitsFood and drug administration agencyImmune checkpoint inhibitorsRandomized trials

Identifiers

PMID32867707
PMCPMC7457752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.