ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2020
Automated Channel Selection in High-Density sEMG for Improved Force Estimation.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Influence of the sEMG Amplitude Estimation Technique on the EMG-Force Relationship.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate and real-time estimation of force from surface electromyogram (EMG) signals enables a variety of applications. We developed and validated new approaches for selecting subsets of high-density (HD) EMG channels for improved and lower-dimensionality force estimation. First, a large dataset was recorded from a number of participants performing isometric contractions in different postures, while simultaneously recording HD-EMG channels and ground-truth force. The EMG signals were acquired from three linear surface electrode arrays, each with eight monopolar channels, and were placed on the long head and short head of the biceps brachii and brachioradialis. After data collection and pre-processing, fast orthogonal search (FOS) was employed for force estimation. To select a subset of channels, principal component analysis (PCA) in the frequency domain and a novel index called the power-correlation ratio (PCR), which maximizes the spectral power while minimizing similarity to other channels, were used. These approaches were compared to channel selection using time-domain PCA. We selected one, two, and three channels per muscle from the original seven differential channels to reduce the redundancy and correlation in the dataset. In the best case, we achieved an approximate improvement of 30% for force estimation while reducing the dimensionality by 57% for a subset of three channels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.