Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32867153›Full record

ArticleNutrients2020

Differences in Gut Microbiome Composition between Senior Orienteering Athletes and Community-Dwelling Older Adults.

Frida Fart, Sukithar Kochappi Rajan, Rebecca Wall, Ignacio Rangel, John Peter Ganda-Mall, Lina Tingö, Robert J Brummer, Dirk Repsilber, Ida Schoultz, Carl Mårten Lindqvist

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Gut · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Frida FartSchool of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, 702 81 Örebro, Sweden.
Sukithar Kochappi RajanSchool of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, 702 81 Örebro, Sweden.
Rebecca WallSchool of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, 702 81 Örebro, Sweden.
Ignacio RangelSchool of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, 702 81 Örebro, Sweden.
John Peter Ganda-MallSchool of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, 702 81 Örebro, Sweden.
Lina TingöSchool of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, 702 81 Örebro, Sweden.
Robert J BrummerSchool of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, 702 81 Örebro, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-0362-0008
Dirk RepsilberSchool of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, 702 81 Örebro, Sweden.
Ida SchoultzSchool of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, 702 81 Örebro, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-8391-1576
Carl Mårten LindqvistSchool of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, 702 81 Örebro, Sweden.
Örebro University · SE

Funding

Bo Rydins Stiftelse för Vetenskaplig Forskning F0514Stiftelsen för Kunskaps- och Kompetensutveckling 20110225
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGastrointestinal (GI) health is an important aspect of general health. Gastrointestinal symptoms are of specific importance for the elderly, an increasing group globally. Hence, promoting the elderly's health and especially gastrointestinal health is important. Gut microbiota can influence gastrointestinal health by modulation of the immune system and the gut-brain axis. Diverse gut microbiota have been shown to be beneficial; however, for the elderly, the gut microbiota is often less diverse. Nutrition and physical activity, in particular, are two components that have been suggested to influence composition or diversity. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn this study, we compared gut microbiota between two groups of elderly individuals: community-dwelling older adults and physically active senior orienteering athletes, where the latter group has less gastrointestinal symptoms and a reported better well-being. With this approach, we explored if certain gut microbiota were related to healthy ageing. The participant data and faecal samples were collected from these two groups and the microbiota was whole-genome sequenced and taxonomically classified with MetaPhlAn.

resultsThe physically active senior orienteers had a more homogeneous microbiota within the group and a higher abundance of

conclusionsOur results suggest specific composition characteristics of healthy microbiota in the elderly, and show that certain components of nutrition as well as psychological distress are not as tightly connected with composition or diversity variation in faecal microbiota samples.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeAgedAthletesFecesFemaleGastrointestinal TractGeriatric AssessmentHumansIndependent LivingMaleagedFaecalibacterium prausnitziigut microbiotametagenomicsorienteering

Identifiers

PMID32867153
PMCPMC7551621
OpenAlexW3080720201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.