Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32866732›Full record

ArticleEnvironment international2020

Volatile organic compounds in feminine hygiene products sold in the US market: A survey of products and health risks.

Nan Lin, Ning Ding, Emily Meza-Wilson, Amila Manuradha Devasurendra, Christopher Godwin, Sung Kyun Park, Stuart Batterman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environment international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Tampons as a source of exposure to metal(loid)s.Environment international · 2024
    Article
  6. Intimate Care Products and Incidence of Hormone-Related Cancers: A Quantitative Bias Analysis.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Personal care product use among diverse women in California: Taking Stock Study.Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nan LinDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Ning DingDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Emily Meza-WilsonCollege of Literature, Science, and the Arts, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Amila Manuradha DevasurendraDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Christopher GodwinDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Sung Kyun ParkDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA; Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Stuart BattermanDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA. Electronic address: stuartb@umich.edu.
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

Strategic Vision & Impact on Environmental HealthP30ES017885 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Dana Dolinoy · 2011 to 2026
$21.3M
NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES017885
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Feminine hygiene products (FHPs) are used on highly permeable and sensitive vaginal and vulvar tissues by many women. These products contain a variety of chemicals, and few regulations require disclosure of their ingredients. The objectives of this study are to identify volatile organic compounds (VOCs) that may be present in these products and to evaluate the potential for exposure and health risk associated with product use. We collected 79 commercially available FHPs, including washes, tampons, menstrual pads, wipes, sprays, powders and moisturizers, and analyzed their composition using purge and trap sampling, thermal desorption, gas chromatography and mass spectroscopy. Exposures and risks were modeled using reasonable upper bound exposure scenarios. The highest VOC concentrations (as total target VOCs) were found in washes, sprays and powders, with median concentrations from 25,000 to 34,000 ng/g. Benzene (maximum: 3,604 ng/g) was detected in 83% of the collected products, and 1,4-dioxane (maximum: 24,354 ng/g) in 50% of the products. VOC composition depended on the FHP type, manufacturer and brand. Products labeled as "organic," "natural," or "for sensitive skin" did not necessarily have lower VOC concentrations. For most FHPs, calculated risks were low; however, menstrual pads had hazard ratios of up to 11, sprays and powders had hazard ratios of up to 2.2 and excess cancer risks of up to 2.1 × 10

Indexed as

Air PollutantsVolatile Organic CompoundsEnvironmental MonitoringFemaleHumansHygiene ProductsSurveys and QuestionnairesAir PollutantsHygiene ProductsVolatile Organic CompoundsExposureFeminine hygiene productsHealth riskVolatile organic compounds

Identifiers

PMID32866732
PMCPMC7958867
OpenAlexW3081594883

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.