Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32866603›Full record

ReviewNeuroscience2021

The Rules of Cerebellar Learning: Around the Ito Hypothesis.

Stephen G Lisberger

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Comparison of Signals from Cerebellar Purkinje Cells and Deep Nuclei during Temporal Prediction in Primates.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Motor learning without movement.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Stephen G LisbergerDepartment of Neurobiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA. Electronic address: lisberger@neuro.duke.edu.

Funding

Canonical computations for motor learning by the cerebellar cortex micro-circuitR01NS112917 · NINDS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI LISBERGER, STEPHEN G, MEDINA, JAVIER F · 2019 to 2023
$6.4M
Neural Control of Eye MovementR01EY027373 · NEI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI LISBERGER, STEPHEN G · 2017 to 2021
$2.6M
Neural Basis for Cerebellar Motor LearningR01NS092623 · NINDS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI LISBERGER, STEPHEN G · 2016 to 2020
$2.5M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY027373NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS092623NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS112917
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As a tribute to Masao Ito, we propose a model of cerebellar learning that incorporates and extends his original model. We suggest four principles that align well with conclusions from multiple cerebellar learning systems. (1) Climbing fiber inputs to the cerebellum drive early, fast, poorly-retained learning in the parallel fiber to Purkinje cell synapse. (2) Learned Purkinje cell outputs drive late, slow, well-retained learning in non-Purkinje cell inputs to neurons in the cerebellar nucleus, transferring learning from the cortex to the nucleus. (3) Recurrent feedback from Purkinje cells to the inferior olive, through interneurons in the cerebellar nucleus, limits the magnitude of fast, early learning in the cerebellar cortex. (4) Functionally different inputs are subjected to plasticity in the cerebellar cortex versus the cerebellar nucleus. A computational neural circuit model that is based on these principles mimics a large amount of neural and behavioral data obtained from the smooth pursuit eye movements of monkeys.

Indexed as

CerebellumPurkinje CellsAnimalsCerebellar NucleiOlivary NucleusPursuit, Smoothcerebellumclimbing fiberfloccular complexlong-term depressionmotor learningsmooth pursuit eye movements

Identifiers

PMID32866603
PMCPMC7914257

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.