Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32866493›Full record

ArticleJournal of theoretical biology2020

Predicting the second wave of COVID-19 in Washtenaw County, MI.

Marissa Renardy, Marisa Eisenberg, Denise Kirschner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of theoretical biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Trust and distrust in low-income Michigan residents during the early COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Marissa RenardyUniversity of Michigan Medical School, United States.
Marisa EisenbergUniversity of Michigan School of Public Health, United States.
Denise KirschnerUniversity of Michigan Medical School, United States. Electronic address: kirschne@umich.edu.

Funding

Predicting protective T-cell responses in Tuberculosis using a systems biology approachR01AI123093 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI FLYNN, JOANNE L., KIRSCHNER, DENISE E · 2016 to 2020
$3.6M
Modeling the Effects of the Environment on Enteric Pathogen DynamicsU01GM110712 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI EISENBERG, JOSEPH N. S. · 2014 to 2018
$3.0M
A Multi-scale systems pharmacology approach to TB therapyU01HL131072 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI DARTOIS, VERONIQUE, FLYNN, JOANNE L. · 2016 to 2019
$2.9M
NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL131072NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI123093NIGMS NIH HHS U01 GM110712
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the patchwork nature of disease epidemics, with infection spread dynamics varying wildly across countries and across states within the US. To explore this issue, we study and predict the spread of COVID-19 in Washtenaw County, MI, which is home to University of Michigan and Eastern Michigan University, and in close proximity to Detroit, MI, a major epicenter of the epidemic in Michigan. We apply a discrete and stochastic network-based modeling framework allowing us to track every individual in the county. In this framework, we construct contact networks based on synthetic population datasets specific for Washtenaw County that are derived from US Census datasets. We assign individuals to households, workplaces, schools, and group quarters (such as prisons or long term care facilities). In addition, we assign casual contacts to each individual at random. Using this framework, we explicitly simulate Michigan-specific government-mandated workplace and school closures as well as social distancing measures. We perform sensitivity analyses to identify key model parameters and mechanisms contributing to the observed disease burden in the three months following the first observed cases of COVID-19 in Michigan. We then consider several scenarios for relaxing restrictions and reopening workplaces to predict what actions would be most prudent. In particular, we consider the effects of 1) different timings for reopening, and 2) different levels of workplace vs. casual contact re-engagement. We find that delaying reopening does not reduce the magnitude of the second peak of cases, but only delays it. Reducing levels of casual contact, on the other hand, both delays and lowers the second peak. Through simulations and sensitivity analyses, we explore mechanisms driving the magnitude and timing of a second wave of infections upon re-opening. We find that the most significant factors are workplace and casual contacts and protective measures taken by infected individuals who have sought care. This model can be adapted to other US counties using synthetic population databases and data specific to those regions.

Indexed as

Models, TheoreticalCommunicable Disease ControlComputer SimulationContact TracingCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19Family CharacteristicsForecastingHumansMichiganPandemicsPneumonia, ViralQuarantineSchoolsWorkplaceCoronavirusEpidemiologyNetwork-based model

Identifiers

PMID32866493
PMCPMC7455546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.