Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32866368›Full record

ReviewACS nano2020

Sustainable Personal Protective Clothing for Healthcare Applications: A Review.

Nazmul Karim, Shaila Afroj, Kate Lloyd, Laura Clarke Oaten, Daria V Andreeva, Chris Carr, Andrew D Farmery, Il-Doo Kim, Kostya S Novoselov

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ACS nano, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 98 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
98citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

98 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. NIR-Assisted Multimodal Strategies for Enhanced Antibacterial Therapy.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

38 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Nazmul KarimCentre for Fine Print Research, The University of West of England, Bower Ashton, Bristol BS3 2JT, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-4426-8995
Shaila AfrojCentre for Fine Print Research, The University of West of England, Bower Ashton, Bristol BS3 2JT, United Kingdom.
Kate LloydTextiles Intelligence, Village Way, Wilmslow, Cheshire SK9 2GH, United Kingdom.
Laura Clarke OatenCentre for Fine Print Research, The University of West of England, Bower Ashton, Bristol BS3 2JT, United Kingdom.
Daria V AndreevaDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, National University of Singapore, 9 Engineering Drive 1, Singapore 117575.
Chris CarrClothworkers' Centre for Textile Materials Innovation for Healthcare, School of Design, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, United Kingdom.
Andrew D FarmeryNuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, The University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3PN, United Kingdom.
Il-Doo KimDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), 291 Daehak-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 34141, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-9970-2218
Kostya S NovoselovDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, National University of Singapore, 9 Engineering Drive 1, Singapore 117575.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Personal protective equipment (PPE) is critical to protect healthcare workers (HCWs) from highly infectious diseases such as COVID-19. However, hospitals have been at risk of running out of the safe and effective PPE including personal protective clothing needed to treat patients with COVID-19, due to unprecedented global demand. In addition, there are only limited manufacturing facilities of such clothing available worldwide, due to a lack of available knowledge about relevant technologies, ineffective supply chains, and stringent regulatory requirements. Therefore, there remains a clear unmet need for coordinating the actions and efforts from scientists, engineers, manufacturers, suppliers, and regulatory bodies to develop and produce safe and effective protective clothing using the technologies that are locally available around the world. In this review, we discuss currently used PPE, their quality, and the associated regulatory standards. We survey the current state-of-the-art antimicrobial functional finishes on fabrics to protect the wearer against viruses and bacteria and provide an overview of protective medical fabric manufacturing techniques, their supply chains, and the environmental impacts of current single-use synthetic fiber-based protective clothing. Finally, we discuss future research directions, which include increasing efficiency, safety, and availability of personal protective clothing worldwide without conferring environmental problems.

Indexed as

Health PersonnelDisease Transmission, InfectiousHumansPersonal Protective EquipmentPractice Guidelines as TopicTextilesantimicrobialantiviralCOVID-19environmental impactmedical textilespersonal protective equipmentPPEprotective clothingsingle-use PPEsustainability

Identifiers

PMID32866368
PMCPMC7518242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.