ReviewClinical and translational science2020
An Evaluation of Biometric Monitoring Technologies for Vital Signs in the Era of COVID-19.
Review in Clinical and translational science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A systematic review and knowledge mapping on ICT-based remote and automatic COVID-19 patient monitoring and care.BMC health services research · 2023Pooled it
- Hospitalization after Initial Telemedicine Versus in-Person Consultation for Outpatients with Respiratory or Digestive Diseases: A Retrospective Cohort Study.JMA journal · 2026Article
- Remote Patient Monitoring and Connected Technologies in Inflammatory Bowel Disease.Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2025Article
- Feasibility, utility, usability and acceptance of a multimodal telemonitoring for COVID-19 patients in general practitioners practices in Germany: a mixed methods study with patients.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- COVID-19 Early Detection in Doctors and Healthcare Workers (CEDiD) study: a cohort study on the feasibility of wearable devices.BMJ open · 2025Observational
- Evaluation of a Telemonitoring System Using Electronic National Early Warning Scores for Patients Receiving Medical Home Care: Pilot Implementation Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2024Article
- Implementing sensor-based digital health technologies in clinical trials: Key considerations from the eCOA Consortium.Clinical and translational science · 2024Review
- Contactless Blood Oxygen Saturation Estimation from Facial Videos Using Deep Learning.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Video plethysmography for contactless measurement of respiratory rate in surgical patients.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2024Article
- A proposed multi-domain, digital model for capturing functional status and health-related quality of life in oncology.Clinical and translational science · 2024Review
- Review of strategies to investigate low sample return rates in remote tobacco trials: A call to action for more user-centered design research.Addiction neuroscience · 2023Article
- Wearable Multisensor Ring-Shaped Probe for Assessing Stress and Blood Oxygenation: Design and Preliminary Measurements.Biosensors · 2023Article
- Pulse Oximetry Imaging System Using Spatially Uniform Dual Wavelength Illumination.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Empowering drug development: Leveraging insights from imaging technologies to enable the advancement of digital health technologies.Clinical and translational science · 2023Review
- Detection and Monitoring of Viral Infections via Wearable Devices and Biometric Data.Annual review of biomedical engineering · 2022Review
- Diagnostic Features and Potential Applications of PPG Signal in Healthcare: A Systematic Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Cardiovascular Disease Screening in Women: Leveraging Artificial Intelligence and Digital Tools.Circulation research · 2022Review
- Deep Learning Methods for Remote Heart Rate Measurement: A Review and Future Research Agenda.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Regulatory, Legal, and Market Aspects of Smart Wearables for Cardiac Monitoring.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Can vital signs recorded in patients' homes aid decision making in emergency care? A Scoping Review.Resuscitation plus · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) global pandemic has shifted how many patients receive outpatient care. Telehealth and remote monitoring have become more prevalent, and measurements taken in a patient's home using biometric monitoring technologies (BioMeTs) offer convenient opportunities to collect vital sign data. Healthcare providers may lack prior experience using BioMeTs in remote patient care, and, therefore, may be unfamiliar with the many versions of BioMeTs, novel data collection protocols, and context of the values collected. To make informed patient care decisions based on the biometric data collected remotely, it is important to understand the engineering solutions embedded in the products, data collection protocols, form factors (physical size and shape), data quality considerations, and availability of validation information. This article provides an overview of BioMeTs available for collecting vital signs (temperature, heart rate, blood pressure, oxygen saturation, and respiratory rate) and discusses the strengths and limitations of continuous monitoring. We provide considerations for remote data collection and sources of validation information to guide BioMeT use in the era of COVID-19 and beyond.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.