Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32866219›Full record

Observational studyPloS one2020

Risk factors for and prediction of post-intubation hypotension in critically ill adults: A multicenter prospective cohort study.

Nathan J Smischney, Rahul Kashyap, Ashish K Khanna, Ernesto Brauer, Lee E Morrow, Mohamed O Seisa, Darrell R Schroeder, Daniel A Diedrich, Ashley Montgomery, Pablo Moreno Franco and 14 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02508948 (Current State of Endotracheal Intubation Among the Critically Ill and Exploring Risk Factors for Immediate Complications of Endotracheal Intubation), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02508948 completednot on this map

Current State of Endotracheal Intubation Among the Critically Ill and Exploring Risk Factors for Immediate Complications of Endotracheal Intubation: a Prospective, Observational Multi-center Study (HEMAIR)

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorMayo ClinicRan2015 to 2019Enrolled1,288ConditionsTracheal Intubation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The Pharmacology of Physiologically Difficult Airway Management and Impact on Hemodynamics: A Review.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Endotracheal intubation sedation in the intensive care unit.World journal of critical care medicine · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 15 institutions in 1 country.

Nathan J SmischneyDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-1051-098X
Rahul KashyapDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-4383-3411
Ashish K KhannaOutcomes Research Consortium, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, United States of America.
Ernesto BrauerDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Aurora Health Care, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States of America.
Lee E MorrowDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Creighton University, Omaha, Nebraska, United States of America.
Mohamed O SeisaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States of America.
Darrell R SchroederDepartment of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States of America.
Daniel A DiedrichDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States of America.
Ashley MontgomeryDepartment of Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, United States of America.
Pablo Moreno FrancoDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, United States of America.
Uchenna R OfomaDivision of Critical Care Medicine, Geisinger Health System, Danville, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
David A KaufmanSection of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Bridgeport Hospital/Yale New Haven Health, Bridgeport, Connecticut, United States of America.
Ayan SenDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona, United States of America.
Cynthia CallahanDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Berkshire Medical Center, Pittsfield, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Chakradhar VenkataDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Mercy Hospital, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of America.
Gozde DemiralpDepartment of Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States of America.
Rudy TedjaDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Memorial Medical Center, Modesto, California, United States of America.
Sarah LeeDivision of Pulmonary, Critical Care & Sleep Medicine, Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, Michigan, United States of America.
Mariya GeubeOutcomes Research Consortium, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, United States of America.
Santhi I KumarDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Kerk School University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-0981-4222
Peter MorrisDepartment of Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, United States of America.
Vikas BansalDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, United States of America.
Salim SuraniDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Corpus Christi Medical Center, Corpus Christi, Texas, United States of America.
SCCM Discovery (Critical Care Research Network of Critical Care Medicine) HEMAIR Investigators Consortium
Mayo Clinic · USCleveland Clinic · USJacksonville College · USUniversity of Kentucky · USAurora Health Care · USBerkshire Medical Center · USBridgeport Hospital · USCreighton University · USDetroit Medical Center · USGeisinger Health System · USMemorial Medical Center · USMercy Hospital · USUniversity of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center · USUniversity of Southern California · USWinnMed · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveHypotension following endotracheal intubation in the ICU is associated with poor outcomes. There is no formal prediction tool to help estimate the onset of this hemodynamic compromise. Our objective was to derive and validate a prediction model for immediate hypotension following endotracheal intubation.

methodsA multicenter, prospective, cohort study enrolling 934 adults who underwent endotracheal intubation across 16 medical/surgical ICUs in the United States from July 2015-January 2017 was conducted to derive and validate a prediction model for immediate hypotension following endotracheal intubation. We defined hypotension as: 1) mean arterial pressure <65 mmHg; 2) systolic blood pressure <80 mmHg and/or decrease in systolic blood pressure of 40% from baseline; 3) or the initiation or increase in any vasopressor in the 30 minutes following endotracheal intubation.

resultsPost-intubation hypotension developed in 344 (36.8%) patients. In the full cohort, 11 variables were independently associated with hypotension: increasing illness severity; increasing age; sepsis diagnosis; endotracheal intubation in the setting of cardiac arrest, mean arterial pressure <65 mmHg, and acute respiratory failure; diuretic use 24 hours preceding endotracheal intubation; decreasing systolic blood pressure from 130 mmHg; catecholamine and phenylephrine use immediately prior to endotracheal intubation; and use of etomidate during endotracheal intubation. A model excluding unstable patients' pre-intubation (those receiving catecholamine vasopressors and/or who were intubated in the setting of cardiac arrest) was also developed and included the above variables with the exception of sepsis and etomidate. In the full cohort, the 11 variable model had a C-statistic of 0.75 (95% CI 0.72, 0.78). In the stable cohort, the 7 variable model C-statistic was 0.71 (95% CI 0.67, 0.75). In both cohorts, a clinical risk score was developed stratifying patients' risk of hypotension.

conclusionsA novel multivariable risk score predicted post-intubation hypotension with accuracy in both unstable and stable critically ill patients. STUDY REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT02508948 and Registered Report Identifier: RR2-10.2196/11101.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesCritical IllnessFemaleHumansHypotensionIntensive Care UnitsIntubation, IntratrachealMaleMiddle AgedModels, BiologicalProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID32866219
PMCPMC7458292
OpenAlexW3082710351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.