Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32866213›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Health services costs for lung cancer care in Australia: Estimates from the 45 and Up Study.

David E Goldsbury, Marianne F Weber, Sarsha Yap, Nicole M Rankin, Preston Ngo, Lennert Veerman, Emily Banks, Karen Canfell, Dianne L O'Connell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Value in care: The contribution of supportive care to value-based lung cancer services-A qualitative semistructured interview study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The economic burden of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis in Australia: a cost of illness study.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

David E GoldsburyCancer Research Division, Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6247-2706
Marianne F WeberCancer Research Division, Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Sarsha YapCancer Research Division, Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Nicole M RankinCancer Research Division, Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Preston NgoCancer Research Division, Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Lennert VeermanCancer Research Division, Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3206-8232
Emily BanksNational Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
Karen CanfellCancer Research Division, Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Dianne L O'ConnellCancer Research Division, Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOf all cancer types, healthcare for lung cancer is the third most costly in Australia, but there is little detailed information about these costs. Our aim was to provide detailed population-based estimates of health system costs for lung cancer care, as a benchmark prior to wider availability of targeted therapies/immunotherapy and to inform cost-effectiveness analyses of lung cancer screening and other interventions in Australia.

methodsHealth system costs were estimated for incident lung cancers in the Australian 45 and Up Study cohort, diagnosed between recruitment (2006-2009) and 2013. Costs to June 2016 included services reimbursed via the Medicare Benefits Schedule, medicines reimbursed via the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme, inpatient hospitalisations, and emergency department presentations. Costs for cases and matched, cancer-free controls were compared to derive excess costs of care. Costs were disaggregated by patient and tumour characteristics. Data for more recent cases identified in hospital records provided preliminary information on targeted therapy/immunotherapy.

results994 eligible cases were diagnosed with lung cancer 2006-2013; 51% and 74% died within one and three years respectively. Excess costs from one-year pre-diagnosis to three years post-diagnosis averaged ~$51,900 per case. Observed costs were higher for cases diagnosed at age 45-59 ($67,700) or 60-69 ($63,500), and lower for cases aged ≥80 ($29,500) and those with unspecified histology ($31,700) or unknown stage ($36,500). Factors associated with lower costs generally related to shorter survival: older age (p<0.0001), smoking (p<0.0001) and unknown stage (p = 0.002). There was no evidence of differences by year of diagnosis or sex (both p>0.50). For 465 cases diagnosed 2014-2015, 29% had subsidised molecular testing for targeted therapy/immunotherapy and 4% had subsidised targeted therapies.

conclusionsLung cancer healthcare costs are strongly associated with survival-related factors. Costs appeared stable over the period 2006-2013. This study provides a framework for evaluating the health/economic impact of introducing lung cancer screening and other interventions in Australia.

Indexed as

Cost-Benefit AnalysisAgedAged, 80 and overAustraliaCase-Control StudiesFemaleHealth ServicesHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedMolecular Targeted TherapyTerminal Care

Identifiers

PMID32866213
PMCPMC7458299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.