ArticlePloS one2020
Health services costs for lung cancer care in Australia: Estimates from the 45 and Up Study.
Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cost-effectiveness of first-line pembrolizumab monotherapy in PD-L1-high metastatic non-small cell lung cancer in Australia: evidence from trials and real-world practice.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2026Article
- Advances and Future Perspectives for the Management of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in Australia: A Narrative Review.Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology · 2026Review
- Article
- Article
- Exploring the Therapeutic Potential of Nobiletin in Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer.BioMed research international · 2026Review
- Quality of Life and Factors Associated with Quality of Life among Patients with Lung Cancer in Northeastern Thailand.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2025Article
- Targeted lung cancer screening in the age of immunotherapies and targeted therapies - an economic evaluation for Australia.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2024Article
- Factors impacting hospitalisation and related health service costs in cancer survivors in Australia: Results from a population data linkage study in Queensland (COS-Q).Cancer medicine · 2024Article
- Value in care: The contribution of supportive care to value-based lung cancer services-A qualitative semistructured interview study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024Article
- Development and Validation of txSim: A Model of Advanced Lung Cancer Treatment in Australia.PharmacoEconomics · 2023Article
- Machine Learning Techniques to Predict Timeliness of Care among Lung Cancer Patients.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- The economic burden of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis in Australia: a cost of illness study.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2023Article
- Health services costs for ovarian cancer in Australia: Estimates from the 45 and Up Study.PloS one · 2023Article
- Development of an Australia and New Zealand Lung Cancer Clinical Quality Registry: a protocol paper.BMJ open · 2022Article
- Adapting Peer Researcher Facilitated Strategies to Recruit People Receiving Mental Health Services to a Tobacco Treatment Trial.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2022Article
- Direct and indirect economic burden of lung cancer in Denmark a nationwide study.European clinical respiratory journal · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOf all cancer types, healthcare for lung cancer is the third most costly in Australia, but there is little detailed information about these costs. Our aim was to provide detailed population-based estimates of health system costs for lung cancer care, as a benchmark prior to wider availability of targeted therapies/immunotherapy and to inform cost-effectiveness analyses of lung cancer screening and other interventions in Australia.
methodsHealth system costs were estimated for incident lung cancers in the Australian 45 and Up Study cohort, diagnosed between recruitment (2006-2009) and 2013. Costs to June 2016 included services reimbursed via the Medicare Benefits Schedule, medicines reimbursed via the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme, inpatient hospitalisations, and emergency department presentations. Costs for cases and matched, cancer-free controls were compared to derive excess costs of care. Costs were disaggregated by patient and tumour characteristics. Data for more recent cases identified in hospital records provided preliminary information on targeted therapy/immunotherapy.
results994 eligible cases were diagnosed with lung cancer 2006-2013; 51% and 74% died within one and three years respectively. Excess costs from one-year pre-diagnosis to three years post-diagnosis averaged ~$51,900 per case. Observed costs were higher for cases diagnosed at age 45-59 ($67,700) or 60-69 ($63,500), and lower for cases aged ≥80 ($29,500) and those with unspecified histology ($31,700) or unknown stage ($36,500). Factors associated with lower costs generally related to shorter survival: older age (p<0.0001), smoking (p<0.0001) and unknown stage (p = 0.002). There was no evidence of differences by year of diagnosis or sex (both p>0.50). For 465 cases diagnosed 2014-2015, 29% had subsidised molecular testing for targeted therapy/immunotherapy and 4% had subsidised targeted therapies.
conclusionsLung cancer healthcare costs are strongly associated with survival-related factors. Costs appeared stable over the period 2006-2013. This study provides a framework for evaluating the health/economic impact of introducing lung cancer screening and other interventions in Australia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.