Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32866200›Full record

Observational studyPloS one2020

The clinical significance of stringent complete response in multiple myeloma is surpassed by minimal residual disease measurements.

Maria-Teresa Cedena, Estela Martin-Clavero, Sandy Wong, Nina Shah, Natasha Bahri, Rafael Alonso, Carmen Barcenas, Antonio Valeri, Johny Salazar Tabares, Jose Sanchez-Pina and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Maria-Teresa CedenaHematology Department, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5851-3720
Estela Martin-ClaveroHematology Department, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
Sandy WongBone Marrow Transplantation and Hematologic Malignancy Unit, Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, United States of America.
Nina ShahBone Marrow Transplantation and Hematologic Malignancy Unit, Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, United States of America.
Natasha BahriBone Marrow Transplantation and Hematologic Malignancy Unit, Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, United States of America.
Rafael AlonsoHematology Department, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
Carmen BarcenasPathology Department, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
Antonio ValeriHematology Department, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
Johny Salazar TabaresPathology Department, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
Jose Sanchez-PinaHematology Department, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
Clara CuellarHematology Department, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
Thomas MartinBone Marrow Transplantation and Hematologic Malignancy Unit, Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, United States of America.
Jeffrey WolfBone Marrow Transplantation and Hematologic Malignancy Unit, Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, United States of America.
Juan-Jose LahuertaHematology Department, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
Joaquin Martinez-LopezHematology Department, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
Hospital Universitario 12 De Octubre · ESUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStringent complete response (sCR) is used as a deeper response category than complete response (CR) in multiple myeloma (MM) but may be of limited value in the era of minimal residual disease (MRD) testing.

methodsHere, we used 4-colour multiparametric flow cytometry (MFC) or next-generation sequencing (NGS) of immunoglobulin genes to analyse and compare the prognostic impact of sCR and MRD monitoring. We included 193 treated patients in two institutions achieving CR, for which both bone marrow aspirates and biopsies were available.

resultsWe found that neither the serum free light chain ratio, clonality by immunohistochemistry (IHC) nor plasma cell bone marrow infiltration identified CR patients at distinct risk. Patients with sCR had slightly longer progression-free survival. Nevertheless, persistent clonal bone marrow disease was detectable using MFC or NGS and was associated with significantly inferior outcomes compared with MRD-negative cases.

conclusionOur results confirm that sCR does not predict a different outcome and indicate that more sensitive techniques are able to identify patients with differing prognoses. We suggest that MRD categories should be implemented over sCR for the future classification of MM responses.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBone MarrowData AccuracyFemaleFlow CytometryFollow-Up StudiesHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansImmunoglobulin Light ChainsMaleMiddle AgedMultiple MyelomaNeoplasm, ResidualPlasma CellsImmunoglobulin Light Chains

Identifiers

PMID32866200
PMCPMC7458342
OpenAlexW3081709649

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.