Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32866177›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Evaluation of nucleosome concentrations in healthy dogs and dogs with cancer.

Heather Wilson-Robles, Tasha Miller, Jill Jarvis, Jason Terrell, Nathan Dewsbury, Terry Kelly, Marielle Herzog, Thomas Bygott, Nathalie Hardat, Gaetan Michel

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. New Perspectives on the Importance of Cell-Free DNA Biology.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Heather Wilson-RoblesSmall Animal Clinical Sciences Department, College of Veterinary Medicine, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-6489-8468
Tasha MillerSmall Animal Clinical Sciences Department, College of Veterinary Medicine, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, United States of America.
Jill JarvisSmall Animal Clinical Sciences Department, College of Veterinary Medicine, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, United States of America.
Jason TerrellVolition America & Volition Veterinary Diagnostic Development, Austin, Texas, United States of America.
Nathan DewsburyVolition America & Volition Veterinary Diagnostic Development, Austin, Texas, United States of America.
Terry KellyVolition America & Volition Veterinary Diagnostic Development, Austin, Texas, United States of America.
Marielle HerzogBelgian Volition SPRL, Isnes, Belgium.
Thomas BygottBelgian Volition SPRL, Isnes, Belgium.
Nathalie HardatBelgian Volition SPRL, Isnes, Belgium.
Gaetan MichelBelgian Volition SPRL, Isnes, Belgium.
Volition (Belgium) · BETexas A&M University · USVolition (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionNucleosomes consist of small fragments of DNA wrapped around a histone octamer core. Diseases such as cancer or inflammation lead to cell death, which causes fragmentation and release of nucleosomes into the blood. The Nu.Q™ technology measures circulating nucleosome levels and exploits the different compositions of cancer derived nucleosomes in blood to detect and identify cancer even at early stages. The objectives of this study are to identify the optimal sample type for the Nu.Q™ H3.1 assay and to determine if it can accurately detect nucleosomes in the blood of healthy canines as well as those with cancer. MATERIALS AND

methodsBlood samples from healthy canine volunteers as well as dogs newly diagnosed with lymphoma were used. The blood was processed at a variety of times under a variety of conditions to determine the most reliable sample type and conditions, and to develop an appropriate processing strategy to ensure reliably accurate results.

resultsNucleosomes could be detected using a variety of sample collection and processing protocols. Nucleosome signals were highest in EDTA plasma and serum samples and most consistent in plasma. Samples should be processed within an hour of collection. Experiments showed that samples were able to withstand several freeze thaw cycles. Processing time and tcollection tube type did affect nucleosome detection levels. Finally, significantly elevated concentrations of nucleosomes were seen in a small cohort of dogs that had been newly diagnosed with lymphoma.

conclusionsWhen samples are collected and processed appropriately, the Nu.Q™ platform can reliably detect nucleosomes in the plasma of dogs. Further testing is underway to validate and optimize the Nu.Q™ platform for veterinary use.

Indexed as

NucleosomesAnimalsDogsEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFeasibility StudiesFemaleLymphomaMaleReagent Kits, DiagnosticReproducibility of ResultsNucleosomesReagent Kits, Diagnostic

Identifiers

PMID32866177
PMCPMC7458307
OpenAlexW3081914638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.