Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32866145›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2020

Household spraying in cholera outbreaks: Insights from three exploratory, mixed-methods field effectiveness evaluations.

Karin Gallandat, Annie Huang, Justine Rayner, Gabrielle String, Daniele S Lantagne

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Cholera Outbreaks in India, 2011-2020: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Karin GallandatDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6412-1483
Annie HuangDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Justine RaynerDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-1035-9872
Gabrielle StringDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-0266-923X
Daniele S LantagneDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Tufts University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Household spraying is a commonly implemented, yet an under-researched, cholera response intervention where a response team sprays surfaces in cholera patients' houses with chlorine. We conducted mixed-methods evaluations of three household spraying programs in the Democratic Republic of Congo and Haiti, including 18 key informant interviews, 14 household surveys and observations, and 418 surface samples collected before spraying, 30 minutes and 24 hours after spraying. The surfaces consistently most contaminated with Vibrio cholerae were food preparation areas, near the patient's bed and the latrine. Effectiveness varied between programs, with statistically significant reductions in V. cholerae concentrations 30 minutes after spraying in two programs. Surface contamination after 24 hours was variable between households and programs. Program challenges included difficulty locating households, transportation and funding limitations, and reaching households quickly after case presentation (disinfection occurred 2-6 days after reported cholera onset). Program advantages included the concurrent deployment of hygiene promotion activities. Further research is indicated on perception, recontamination, cost-effectiveness, viable but nonculturable V. cholerae, and epidemiological coverage. We recommend that, if spraying is implemented, spraying agents should: disinfect surfaces systematically until wet using 0.2/2.0% chlorine solution, including kitchen spaces, patients' beds, and latrines; arrive at households quickly; and, concurrently deploy hygiene promotion activities.

Indexed as

Family CharacteristicsChlorineCholeraCongoDisease OutbreaksDisinfectionFemaleHaitiHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesToilet FacilitiesVibrio choleraeChlorine

Identifiers

PMID32866145
PMCPMC7485970
OpenAlexW3082331726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.