ArticleCirculation2020
Response by Sreejit and Nagareddy to Letter Regarding Article, "Neutrophil-Derived S100A8/A9 Amplify Granulopoiesis After Myocardial Infarction".
Article in Circulation, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Simulating vagus nerve stimulation through Basti therapy: A novel approach to anti-inflammatory treatment in Parkinson's disease model.Journal of Ayurveda and integrative medicine · 2026Review
- Pseudomonas aeruginosa pulmonary infection results in S100A8/A9-dependent cardiac dysfunction.PLoS pathogens · 2023Article
- Emerging roles of neutrophil-borne S100A8/A9 in cardiovascular inflammation.Pharmacological research · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
- Comment on
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.