Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32865852›Full record

ArticleAlcoholism, clinical and experimental research2020

High Alcohol-Preferring Mice Show Reaction to Loss of Ethanol Reward Following Repeated Binge Drinking.

Cherish E Ardinger, Nicholas J Grahame, Christopher C Lapish, David N Linsenbardt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Animal Models of Excessive Alcohol Consumption in Rodents.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Cherish E ArdingerFrom the, Addiction Neuroscience (CEA, NJG, CCL), Department of Psychology, Indiana Alcohol Research Center, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4403-4600
Nicholas J GrahameFrom the, Addiction Neuroscience (CEA, NJG, CCL), Department of Psychology, Indiana Alcohol Research Center, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3279-2279
Christopher C LapishFrom the, Addiction Neuroscience (CEA, NJG, CCL), Department of Psychology, Indiana Alcohol Research Center, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4388-4438
David N LinsenbardtDepartment of Neurosciences (DNL), School of Medicine, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2447-0683

Funding

Translational Research and Science Education (OUT)P60AA007611 · NIAAA · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI DAVID A. KAREKEN · 2003 to 2026
$45.5M
Understanding neurophysiological deficits in response inhibition in children with FASDP50AA022534 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO HEALTH SCIS CTR · PI Carlos Fernando Valenzuela · 2014 to 2026
$21.5M
RAT RESEARCH COMPONENTP50AA007611 · NIAAA · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI CHRISTIAN, JOE C · 1987 to 2002
$5.3M
Prefrontal cortex regulation of ethanol-reinforced behaviorR01AA023786 · NIAAA · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI LAPISH, CHRISTOPHER COURT · 2015 to 2019
$1.7M
Repeated Binge Drinking and the Genetic Regulation of Corticostriatal SynchronyR00AA025120 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO HEALTH SCIS CTR · PI LINSENBARDT, DAVID NATHANIEL · 2020 to 2022
$993k
Repeated Binge Drinking and the Genetic Regulation of Corticostriatal SynchronyK99AA025120 · NIAAA · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI LINSENBARDT, DAVID NATHANIEL · 2017 to 2018
$316k
Electrophysiological ensembles organization during alcohol cue-induced intake andF32AA022268 · NIAAA · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI LINSENBARDT, DAVID NATHANIEL · 2013 to 2015
$155k
NIAAA NIH HHS AA022268NIAAA NIH HHS AA025120NIAAA NIH HHS F32 AA022268NIAAA NIH HHS K99 AA025120NIAAA NIH HHS P50 AA007611NIAAA NIH HHS P50 AA022534NIAAA NIH HHS P50-AA022534NIAAA NIH HHS P60 AA007611NIAAA NIH HHS P60-AA007611NIAAA NIH HHS R00 AA025120NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA023786
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBeyond yielding high blood ethanol (EtOH) concentrations (BECs), binge-drinking models allow examination of drinking patterns which may be associated with EtOH's rewarding effects, including front-loading and consummatory successive negative contrast (cSNC), a decrease in intake when only water is available to subjects expecting EtOH. The goals of the current study were to broaden our understanding of these reward-related behaviors during binge EtOH access in high alcohol-preferring (HAP) replicate lines (HAP2 and HAP3) of mice selectively bred to prefer alcohol. We hypothesized that both lines would show evidence of front-loading during binge EtOH access and that we would find a cSNC effect in groups where EtOH was replaced with water, as these results have been shown previously in HAP1 mice.

methodsHAP replicate 2 and replicate 3 female and male mice were given 2 hours of EtOH or water access in the home cage for 15 consecutive days using "drinking in the dark" (DID) procedures. Mice received the same fluid (either 20% unsweetened EtOH or water) for the first 14 days. However, on the 15th day, half of the mice from these 2 groups were provided with the opposite assigned fluid (EtOH groups received water and vice versa). Intake was measured in 1-minute bins using specialized sipper tubes, which allowed within-session analyses of binge-drinking patterns.

resultsEtOH front-loading was observed in both replicates. HAP3 mice displayed front-loading on the first day of EtOH access, whereas front-loading developed following alcohol experience in HAP2 mice, which may suggest differences in initial sensitivity to EtOH reward. Consummatory SNC, which manifests as lower water intake in mice expecting EtOH as compared to mice expecting water, was observed in both replicates.

conclusionsThese findings increase confidence that defined changes in home cage consummatory behavior are driven by the incentive value of EtOH. The presence of cSNC across HAP replicates indicates that this reaction to loss of reward is genetically mediated, which suggests that there is a biological mechanism that might be targeted.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalDrinking BehaviorRewardAlcohol DrinkingAnimalsBinge DrinkingCentral Nervous System DepressantsDrinking WaterEthanolFemaleMaleMiceMice, Inbred StrainsSelf AdministrationCentral Nervous System DepressantsDrinking WaterEthanolBinge DrinkingConsummatory Successive Negative ContrastEthanol IntakeFront-LoadingHigh Alcohol-Preferring MiceRate of Alcohol

Identifiers

PMID32865852
PMCPMC8384089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.