ArticleJournal of community genetics2021
Public engagement with genomic medicine: a summary of town hall discussions.
Article in Journal of community genetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Evaluating whole genome sequencing for rare diseases in newborn screening: evidence synthesis from a series of systematic reviews.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2025Pooled it
- Article
- Oncology nurses' readiness to implement genomics-informed care: A descriptive, cross-sectional study in a Canadian province.Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique · 2026Article
- Public attitudes towards genomic data sharing: results from a provincial online survey in Canada.BMC medical ethics · 2023Article
- Public interest in unexpected genomic findings: a survey study identifying aspects of sequencing attitudes that influence preferences.Journal of community genetics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Engaging with the public for their input about genomic medicine is critical before it is implemented into routine healthcare practice. In order to inform discussion and planning for the introduction of genome sequencing into clinical care in an Eastern Canadian province, we implemented a program of public engagement activities. Here, we report a qualitative summary of two town hall discussions utilizing a hybrid information-consultation approach with 20 residents of the province of Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada. Discussion revealed largely positive attitudes towards genomic medicine; however, critical reflection around informed consent models, the return of sequencing findings, and access to qualified healthcare professionals revealed numerous public concerns. Public support will be important to realize the potential benefits of genomics and precision medicine to health outcomes. Our findings highlight public concerns that must be addressed in educational and informed consent documents related to sequencing. Town hall attendees endorsed ongoing public education and awareness-building initiatives which could help foster transparency and trust as genomics is integrated into healthcare systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.