Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32865766›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer survivorship : research and practice2021

A core set of patient-reported outcomes for population-based cancer survivorship research: a consensus study.

Imogen Ramsey, Nadia Corsini, Amanda D Hutchinson, Julie Marker, Marion Eckert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Trajectories of participation in daily life among individuals newly diagnosed with cancer: A 5-month longitudinal study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Anticipating mental health needs after chemotherapy in early-stage breast cancer using patient-reported symptom screening.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Imogen RamseyRosemary Bryant AO Research Centre, UniSA Clinical & Health Sciences, University of South Australia, City East Campus, GPO Box 2471, Adelaide, South Australia, 5001, Australia. imogen.ramsey@unisa.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-8757-1572
Nadia CorsiniRosemary Bryant AO Research Centre, UniSA Clinical & Health Sciences, University of South Australia, City East Campus, GPO Box 2471, Adelaide, South Australia, 5001, Australia.
Amanda D HutchinsonUniSA Justice & Society, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Julie MarkerCancer Voices South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.
Marion EckertRosemary Bryant AO Research Centre, UniSA Clinical & Health Sciences, University of South Australia, City East Campus, GPO Box 2471, Adelaide, South Australia, 5001, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCore outcome sets aim to improve the consistency and quality of research by providing agreed-upon recommendations regarding what outcomes should be measured as a minimum for a population and setting. This study aimed to identify a core set of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) representing the most important issues impacting on cancer survivors' long-term health, functioning, and quality of life, to inform population-based research on cancer survivorship.

methodsIn phase I, a list of 46 outcomes was generated through focus groups (n = 5) with cancer survivors (n = 40) and a review of instruments for assessing quality of life in cancer survivorship. In phase II, 69 national experts in cancer survivorship practice, research, policy, and lived experience participated in a two-round Delphi survey to refine and prioritise the listed outcomes into a core outcome set. A consensus meeting was held with a sub-sample of participants to discuss and finalise the included outcomes.

resultsTwelve outcome domains were agreed upon for inclusion in the core outcome set: depression, anxiety, pain, fatigue, cognitive problems, fear of cancer recurrence or progression, functioning in everyday activities and roles, financial toxicity, coping with cancer, overall bother from side effects, overall quality of life, and overall health status.

conclusionsWe established a core set of PROs to standardise assessment of cancer survivorship concerns at a population level. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Adoption of the core outcome set will ensure that survivorship outcomes considered important by cancer survivors are assessed as a minimum in future studies. Furthermore, its routine use will optimise the comparability, quality, and usefulness of the data cancer survivors provide in population-based research.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsQuality of LifeConsensusDelphi TechniqueHumansPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresResearch DesignSurvivorshipCancer survivorshipConsensusCore outcome setDelphi studyPatient-reported outcomesQuality of life

Identifiers

PMID32865766
PMCPMC7966135

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.