Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32865573›Full record

SynthesisJAMA network open2020

Risk of Chronic Cardiomyopathy Among Patients With the Acute Phase or Indeterminate Form of Chagas Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Sindhu Chadalawada, Stefan Sillau, Solana Archuleta, William Mundo, Mehdi Bandali, Gabriel Parra-Henao, Alfonso J Rodriguez-Morales, Wilmer E Villamil-Gomez, José Antonio Suárez, Leland Shapiro and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in JAMA network open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Clinical Progression of Cardiac ChronicPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Coinfection by multipleMicrobiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 8 institutions in 5 countries.

Sindhu ChadalawadaNRI Medical College, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Stefan SillauDepartment of Neurology, University of Colorado Denver, Denver.
Solana ArchuletaUniversity of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora.
William MundoUniversity of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora.
Mehdi BandaliUniversity of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora.
Gabriel Parra-HenaoNational Institute of Health, Bogotá, Colombia.
Alfonso J Rodriguez-MoralesPublic Health and Infection Research Group, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad Tecnológica de Pereira, Pereira, Risaralda, Colombia.
Wilmer E Villamil-GomezDepartamento de Infectología, Hospital Universitario de Sincelejo, Sucre, Colombia.
José Antonio SuárezInvestigador Sistema Nacional de Investigación, Secretaría Nacional de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación, Clinical Research Department, Instituto Conmemorativo Gorgas de Estudios de la Salud, Panamá City, Panamá.
Leland ShapiroRocky Mountain Regional Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Aurora, Colorado.
Peter J HotezTexas Children's Hospital Center for Vaccine Development, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas.
Laila Woc-ColburnDivision of Infectious Diseases, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Kristen DeSantoHealth Sciences Library, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora.
Anis RassiDivision of Cardiology, Anis Rassi Hospital, Goiania, Goias, Brazil.
Carlos Franco-ParedesDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Denver, Denver.
Andrés F Henao-MartínezDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Denver, Denver.
University of Colorado Denver · USBaylor College of Medicine · USEmory University · USFundación Universitaria Autónoma De Las Américas · COHospital Universitario de Sincelejo · COInstituto Conmemorativo Gorgas de Estudios de la Salud · PANRI Medical CollegeUniversidad Cooperativa de Colombia · CO

Funding

CTSA INFRASTRUCTURE FOR PEDIATRIC RESEARCHUL1RR025780 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI SOKOL, RONALD J. · 2008 to 2011
$61.3M
NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR025780
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Chagas cardiomyopathy is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Precise estimates of the risk of developing cardiomyopathy among patients with the acute or indeterminate chronic forms of Chagas disease are lacking. Objective: To estimate the risk of developing chronic cardiomyopathy in patients with acute and indeterminate chronic forms of Chagas disease. Data Sources: A systematic search in the Cochrane Library, Embase, Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature (LILACS), Medline, and Web of Science Core Collection databases was conducted from October 8 to October 24, 2018. Studies published between January 1, 1946, and October 24, 2018, that were written in the English, Spanish, and Portuguese languages were included. Search terms included Chagas disease; development of cardiomyopathy; latency duration; and determinants of the Chagas latency period. Study Selection: Longitudinal observational studies of participants diagnosed with the acute phase of Chagas infection or the indeterminate chronic form of Chagas disease who were followed up until the development of cardiomyopathy were included. Studies were excluded if they did not provide sufficient outcome data. Of 10 761 records initially screened, 32 studies met the criteria for analysis. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Critical appraisals of studies were performed using checklists from the Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewer's Manual, and data were collected from published studies. A random-effects meta-analysis was used to obtain pooled estimated annual rates. Data were analyzed from September 11 to December 4, 2019. This study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guideline for the registration of the protocol, data collection and integrity, assessment of bias, and sensitivity analyses. Main Outcomes and Measures: Main outcomes were defined as the composite of the development of any new arrhythmias or changes in electrocardiogram results, dilated cardiomyopathy and segmental wall motion abnormalities in echocardiogram results, and mortality associated with Chagas disease. Results: A total of 5005 records were screened for eligibility. Of those, 298 full-text articles were reviewed, and 178 of those articles were considered for inclusion in the quantitative synthesis. After exclusions, 32 studies that included longitudinal observational outcomes were selected for the analysis; 23 of those studies comprised patients with the indeterminate chronic form of Chagas disease, and 9 of those studies comprised patients in the acute phase of Chagas infection. The analysis indicated that the pooled estimated annual rate of cardiomyopathy development was 1.9% (95% CI, 1.3%-3.0%; I2 = 98.0%; τ2 [ln scale] = 0.9992) in patients with indeterminate chronic Chagas disease and 4.6% (95% CI, 2.7%-7.9%; I2 = 86.6%; τ2 [ln scale] = 0.4946) in patients with acute Chagas infection. Conclusions and Relevance: Patients with the indeterminate chronic form of Chagas disease had a significant annual risk of developing cardiomyopathy. The annual risk was more than double among patients in the acute phase of Chagas infection.

Indexed as

CardiomyopathiesChagas DiseaseAdultArrhythmias, CardiacChildFemaleHumansMale

Identifiers

PMID32865573
PMCPMC7489816
OpenAlexW3082531276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.