Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32865521›Full record

ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2020

Correlation Between Parameters of Intervertebral Disc and Cervical Lordosis in Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy.

Zhuxi Huang, Yue Zhu, Wei Yuan

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Approach to assess the effect of sagittal cervical alignment on three-dimensional movement of the cervical spine in spondylosis patients.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Zhuxi HuangDepartment of Orthopedics, First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China (mainland).
Yue ZhuDepartment of Orthopedics, First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China (mainland).
Wei YuanDepartment of Orthopedics, First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China (mainland).
First Hospital of China Medical University · CNChina Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND In cervical disc degeneration, cervical disc height (CDH) and cervical disc angle (CDA)have a certain but unidentified relationship with cervical lordosis (CL). This study aimed to reveal the relationship among CDH, CDA, and CL in patients diagnosed with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). MATERIAL AND METHODS A retrospective analysis was conducted using the data of 212 CSM patients (136 males and 76 females). According to CL angle, patients were classified into 2 groups: patients with CL ≤10° constituted Group 1 (n=102); patients with CL >10° constituted Group 2 (n=110). The CDH, CDA, and CL were measured using X-ray imaging. Pearson correlation analysis measured the correlation between CDH, CDA, and CL. Multiple linear regression was utilized to analyze the effects of CDH and CDA on CL. RESULTS The CDAs in every level were higher in Group 2 than those in Group 1 (P.

Indexed as

AdultCervical VertebraeFemaleHumansIntervertebral DiscLordosisMaleMiddle AgedX-Rays

Identifiers

PMID32865521
PMCPMC7450784
OpenAlexW3082738824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.