Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32865502›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2020

Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus Virtual Patient Network as a Peer Support Community: Protocol for Social Network Analysis and Content Analysis.

Nancy Wu, Anne-Sophie Brazeau, Meranda Nakhla, Deborah Chan, Deborah Da Costa, Geetha Mukerji, Sonia Butalia, Daniele Pacaud, Mélanie Henderson, Constadina Panagiotopoulos and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Older Adult Engagement With FacebookJournal of gerontological nursing · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Assessment of Selected Aspects of the Quality of Life of Children with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus in Poland.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Nancy WuCentre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9397-8937
Anne-Sophie BrazeauSchool of Human Nutrition, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2699-2920
Meranda NakhlaCentre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5833-5303
Deborah ChanCentre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5006-1651
Deborah Da CostaCentre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4993-4544
Geetha MukerjiInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6477-9848
Sonia ButaliaDepartment of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7865-9161
Daniele PacaudDepartment of Pediatrics, Alberta Children's Hospital, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6337-7241
Mélanie HendersonDivision of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Faculty of Medicine, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0102-2389
Constadina PanagiotopoulosDivision of Endocrinology, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1379-7472
Elham RahmeCentre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4168-4993
Kaberi DasguptaCentre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2447-3553

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundType 1 Diabetes Mellitus Virtual Patient Network (T1DM-VPN) is a private Facebook group for youths with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) in Canada intended to facilitate peer-to-peer support. It was built on the finding that stigma is prevalent among youth with T1DM and impedes self-management.

objectiveWe aim to determine if T1DM-VPN provides support as intended and to ascertain what type of members provide support. Specifically, we will (1) identify text consistent with any one of 5 social support categories, (2) describe the network by visualizing its structure and reporting basic engagement statistics, and (3) determine whether being a designated peer leader is related to a member's centrality (ie, importance in the network) and how frequently they offer social support.

methodsWe will manually extract interaction data from the Facebook group (posts, comments, likes/reactions, seen) generated from June 21, 2017 (addition of first member), to March 1, 2020. Two researchers will independently code posts and comments according to an existing framework of 5 social support categories-informational, emotional, esteem, network, and tangible-with an additional framework for nonsocial support categories. We will calculate how frequently each code is used. We will also report basic engagement statistics (eg, number of posts made per person-month) and generate a visualization of the network. We will identify stable time intervals in the history of T1DM-VPN by modeling monthly membership growth as a Poisson process. Within each interval, each member's centrality will be calculated and standardized to that of the most central member. We will use a centrality formula that considers both breadth and depth of connections (centrality = 0.8 × total No. of connections + 0.2 × total No. of interactions). Finally, we will construct multivariate linear regression models to assess whether peer leader status predicts member centrality and the frequency of offering social support. Other variables considered for inclusion in the models are gender and age at diagnosis.

resultsT1DM-VPN was launched in June 2017. As of March 1, 2020, it has 196 patient-members. This research protocol received ethics approval from the McGill University Health Centre Research Ethics Board on May 20, 2020. Baseline information about each group member was collected upon addition into the group, and collection of interaction data is ongoing as of May 2020.

conclusionsThis content analysis and social network analysis study of a virtual patient network applies epidemiological methods to account for dynamic growth and activity. The results will allow for an understanding of the topics of importance to youth with T1DM and how a virtual patient network evolves over time. This work is intended to serve as a foundation for future action to help youth improve their experience of living with diabetes. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/18714.

Indexed as

content analysissocial mediasocial network analysistype 1 diabetesyouth

Identifiers

PMID32865502
PMCPMC7490683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.