Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32865489›Full record

ArticleDeutsches Arzteblatt international2020

Medical Emergencies During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Anna Slagman, Wilhelm Behringer, Felix Greiner, Matthias Klein, Dirk Weismann, Bernadett Erdmann, Mareen Pigorsch, Martin Möckel, AKTIN Emergency Department Registry, German Forum of University Emergency Departments (FUN) in the Society of University Clinics of Germany E.V.

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Deutsches Arzteblatt international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 78 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
78citing papers in PubMed
8.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

78 citing papers in PubMed, 119 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

18 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Anna SlagmanDepartments of Emergency and Acute Medicine, Campus Mitte and Virchow-Klinikum Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Wilhelm BehringerDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University Hospital Jena
Felix GreinerAKTIN Emergency Department Registry and Department of Trauma Surgery, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg
Matthias KleinCentral Emergency Department, Klinikum Großhadern, Ludwig-Maximilians Universität München
Dirk WeismannDepartment of Internal Emergency and Intensive Care Medicine and Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Würzburg
Bernadett ErdmannAKTIN Emergency Department Registry and Klinikum Wolfsburg
Mareen PigorschInstitute of Biometry and Clinical Epidemiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Martin MöckelDepartments of Emergency and Acute Medicine, Campus Mitte and Virchow-Klinikum Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin
AKTIN Emergency Department Registry
German Forum of University Emergency Departments (FUN) in the Society of University Clinics of Germany E.V.
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEFraunhofer Project Centre Wolfsburg · DEFriedrich Schiller University Jena · DELudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEOtto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg · DEUniversity of Würzburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn this study, we investigate the number of emergency room consultations during the COVID-19 pandemic of 2020 in Germany compared to figures from the previous year.

methodsCase numbers from calendar weeks 1 through 22 of the two consecutive years 2019 and 2020 were obtained from 29 university hospitals and 7 non-university hospitals in Germany. Information was also obtained on the patients' age, sex, and urgency, along with the type of case (outpatient/inpatient), admitting ward, and a small number of tracer diagnoses (I21, myocardial infarction; J44, COPD; and I61, I63, I64, G45, stroke /TIA), as well as on the number of COVID-19 cases and of tests performed for SARS-CoV-2, as a measure of the number of cases in which COVID-19 was suspected or at least included in the differential diagnoses.

resultsA total of 1 022 007 emergency room consultations were analyzed, of which 546 940 took place in 2019 and 475 067 in 2020. The number of consultations with a positive test for the COVID-19 pathogen was 3122. The total number of emergency room consultations in the observation period was 13% lower in 2020 than in 2019, with a maximum drop by 38% coinciding with the highest number of COVID-19 cases (calendar week 14; 572 cases). After the initiation of interpersonal contact restrictions in 2020, there was a marked drop in COVID-19 case numbers, by a mean of -240 cases per week per emergency room (95% confidence interval [-284; -128]). There was a rise in case numbers thereafter, by a mean of 17 patients per week [14; 19], and the number of cases of myocardial infarction returned fully to the level seen in 2019.

conclusionIn Germany, the COVID-19 pandemic led to a significant drop in medical emergencies of all kinds presenting to the nation's emergency departments. A recovery effect began to be seen as early as calendar week 15, but the levels seen in 2019 were not yet reached overall by calendar week 22; only the prevalence of myocardial infarction had renormalized by then. The reasons for this require further investigation.

Indexed as

PandemicsCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19EmergenciesEmergency Service, HospitalGermanyHumansPneumonia, Viral

Identifiers

PMID32865489
PMCPMC8171546
OpenAlexW3082560263

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.