Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32865348›Full record

ArticleVeterinary medicine and science2021

Antimicrobial use practices and resistance in indicator bacteria in communal cattle in the Mnisi community, Mpumalanga, South Africa.

Charlotte Ropafadzo Mupfunya, Daniel Nenene Qekwana, Vinny Naidoo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary medicine and science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Occurrence of Antimicrobial-ResistantVeterinary medicine international · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Genomic Characterization ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  7. Nasotracheal enterococcal carriage and resistomes: detection of optrA-, poxtA- and cfrD-carrying strains in migratory birds, livestock, pets, and in-contact humans in Spain.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Charlotte Ropafadzo MupfunyaDepartment of Veterinary Tropical Diseases, University of Pretoria, Onderstepoort, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-7160-0914
Daniel Nenene QekwanaDepartment of Paraclinical Studies, University of Pretoria, Onderstepoort, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-4609-5151
Vinny NaidooDepartment of Paraclinical Studies, University of Pretoria, Onderstepoort, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0003-2740-5983

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Surveillance of antimicrobial use and antimicrobial resistance is a critical component of the "Global Action Plan" to tackle antimicrobial resistance. However, there is a paucity of such surveillance in communal farming areas in South Africa. This study investigated knowledge and antimicrobial use practices by cattle farmers and antimicrobial resistance levels of indicator bacteria in cattle in a rural communal farming area in South Africa. Seventy (70) farmers were interviewed at five cattle inspection sites using structured questionnaires. Rectal swabs were collected from apparently healthy cattle (n = 100) for culture of Escherichia coli and Enterococcus species, and antimicrobial susceptibility testing using broth microdilution. The farmers indicated predominantly using tetracyclines. Although 42% of the farmers indicated hearing about antimicrobial resistance, none of them clearly understood what it involves. Seventy-nine (79) E. coli and 71 Enterococcus species were isolated with E. faecium being the dominant species among the Enterococcus isolates. E. coli isolates were resistant to colistin (16%; 13/79), chlortetracycline (8%; 6/79) and amoxicillin (8%; 6/79). Enterococcus isolates were resistant to enrofloxacin (55%; 39/71) and amoxycillin (3%; 2/71). We observed knowledge gaps in prudent antimicrobial use practices and antimicrobial resistance among the farmers. Farmer tailored education programmes on primary animal health care and prudent antimicrobial use practices must be developed and implemented to improve antimicrobial stewardship among farmers with limited veterinary supervision. The level of colistin resistance detected among E. coli isolates from rural communal cattle in this study was unexpected and warrants further molecular investigation to check if the resistance is plasmid mediated.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, BacterialAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsCattleEnterococcusEscherichia coliMicrobial Sensitivity TestsSouth AfricaAnti-Bacterial Agentsantimicrobial resistanceantimicrobial usecommunal farmingEnterococcusEscherichia colisurveillance

Identifiers

PMID32865348
PMCPMC7840202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.