Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32864854›Full record

ArticleBirth defects research2021

Associations between cumulative environmental quality and ten selected birth defects in Texas.

Alison K Krajewski, Kristen M Rappazzo, Peter H Langlois, Lynne C Messer, Danelle T Lobdell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Birth defects research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alison K KrajewskiOak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE) Postdoctoral Fellow at United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA), Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1916-5310
Kristen M RappazzoUS EPA, Office of Research and Development, Center of Public Health and Environmental Assessment, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9939-0883
Peter H LangloisTexas Department of State Health Services, Birth Defects Epidemiology and Surveillance Branch, Austin, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6765-4963
Lynne C MesserOHSU-PSU School of Public Health, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Danelle T LobdellUS EPA, Office of Research and Development, Center of Public Health and Environmental Assessment, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.

Funding

EPA EP-17-D-000079Intramural EPA EPA999999Oak Ridge Institute for Science and EducationU.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Research and Development (ORD) EP09D000003U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Research and Development (ORD) EP12D000264
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCauses of most birth defects are largely unknown. Genetics, maternal factors (e.g., age, smoking) and environmental exposures have all been linked to some birth defects, including neural tube, oral cleft, limb reduction, and gastroschisis; however, the contribution of cumulative exposures across several environmental domains in association with these defects is not well understood.

methodsThe Environmental Quality Index (EQI) and its domains (air, water, land, sociodemographic, built) were used to estimate county-level cumulative environmental exposures from 2006-2010 and matched to birth defects identified from Texas Birth Defects Registry and live birth records from births in years 2007-2010 (N = 1,610,709). Poisson regression models estimated prevalence ratios (PR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for associations between 10 birth defects and the EQI.

resultsWe observed some positive associations between worst environmental quality and neural tube, anencephaly, spina bifida, oral cleft, cleft palate, cleft lip with and without cleft palate, and gastroschisis [PR range: 1.12-1.55], but near null associations with limb reduction defects. Among domain specific results, we observed the strongest positive associations with the sociodemographic domain across birth defects but varied positive associations among the air and water domains, and negative or null associations with the land and built domains. Overall, few exposure-response patterns were evident.

conclusionsOur results highlight the complexities of cumulative, simultaneous environmental exposures in the prevalence rates of 10 selected birth defects. We were able to explore the impact of overall and domain specific environmental quality on birth defects and identify potential domain specific drivers of these associations.

Indexed as

Cleft LipCleft PalateEnvironmental ExposureHumansPrevalenceTexasairbirth defectsenvironmental qualitysociodemographicwater

Identifiers

PMID32864854
PMCPMC8091812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.