Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32864726›Full record

ArticleClinical oral investigations2021

Physicochemical, antimicrobial, and biological properties of White-MTAFlow.

Lauter E Pelepenko, Flavia Saavedra, Thiago B M Antunes, Gabriela F Bombarda, Brenda P F A Gomes, Alexandre A Zaia, Josette Camilleri, Marina A Marciano

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Antibacterial activity of biodentine againstFrontiers in dental medicine · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Lauter E PelepenkoDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry of Piracicaba, State University of Campinas, Av. Limeira, 901, Areião, Piracicaba, São Paulo, CEP 13414-903, Brazil. lauterpelepenko@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8365-8267
Flavia SaavedraDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry of Piracicaba, State University of Campinas, Av. Limeira, 901, Areião, Piracicaba, São Paulo, CEP 13414-903, Brazil.
Thiago B M AntunesDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry of Piracicaba, State University of Campinas, Av. Limeira, 901, Areião, Piracicaba, São Paulo, CEP 13414-903, Brazil.
Gabriela F BombardaDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry of Piracicaba, State University of Campinas, Av. Limeira, 901, Areião, Piracicaba, São Paulo, CEP 13414-903, Brazil.
Brenda P F A GomesDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry of Piracicaba, State University of Campinas, Av. Limeira, 901, Areião, Piracicaba, São Paulo, CEP 13414-903, Brazil.
Alexandre A ZaiaDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry of Piracicaba, State University of Campinas, Av. Limeira, 901, Areião, Piracicaba, São Paulo, CEP 13414-903, Brazil.
Josette CamilleriCollege of Medical Sciences, Dental School, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Marina A MarcianoDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry of Piracicaba, State University of Campinas, Av. Limeira, 901, Areião, Piracicaba, São Paulo, CEP 13414-903, Brazil.
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BRUniversity of Birmingham · GB

Funding

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2017/05096-7, 2017/17785-1, 2018/06515-6, 2018/06903-6 and 2018/166722-9
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate a new material containing tantalum oxide as an alternative radiopacifier, and a water-based gel for hydration, in comparison with two calcium silicate-based cement: ProRoot MTA and Biodentine. MATERIALS AND

methodsProRoot MTA (Dentsply), Biodentine (Septodont), and a new hydraulic calcium silicate cement White-MTAFlow (Ultradent) (in 'thin' consistency) were characterized using X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and energy-dispersive spectroscopy (EDS). The interaction with dentin was also assessed using SEM and EDS. Physical and chemical properties radiopacity, setting time, linear flow, volumetric central filling, and lateral flow, pH, and volume change were investigated together with the color luminosity (L) and color change (ΔE). The agar diffusion and direct contact antimicrobial activity, and methylthiazolyldiphenyl-tetrazolium-bromide (MTT) cytotoxicity using human fibroblast cells were also evaluated. Data were statistically analyzed at a 5% significance level.

resultsAll materials were composed of tricalcium and dicalcium silicate but had different radiopacifiers, and calcium hydroxide (portlandite) deposition was detected in XRD analysis. White-MTAFlow exhibited radiopacity values in accordance with ISO standard, and the longest setting time. The water-based gel provided the highest linear flow, a comparable cavity central filling, and the highest groove-lateral flow in the volumetric flow analysis. White-MTAFlow exhibited an alkalinity reduction, and Biodentine, a progressive increase of pH values after 28 days. However, similar volume loss for White-MTAFlow was assessed in comparison to Biodentine after the 28-day immersion. White-MTAFlow showed the highest L value (91.5), and ProRoot MTA the lowest (78.1) due to dentin staining caused by bismuth migration. None of the materials exhibited inhibition halos against the tested bacteria, and similar turbidity values were obtained after 48 h in direct contact with E. faecalis, indicating an upregulation to bacterial growth. White-MTAFlow showed MTT cytocompatibility similarly to the control group.

conclusionsWhite-MTAFlow in 'thin' consistency presents comparable physicochemical, biological, and antimicrobial properties to ProRoot MTA and Biodentine, and does not cause color alteration in dentin. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: White-MTAFlow is a suitable material for use as reparative endodontic cement. Further studies considering its biocompatibility are necessary.

Indexed as

Anti-Infective AgentsRoot Canal Filling MaterialsAluminum CompoundsCalcium CompoundsCalcium HydroxideDental CementsDrug CombinationsHumansMaterials TestingMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningOxidesSilicatesSurface PropertiesAluminum CompoundsAnti-Infective AgentsCalcium CompoundsCalcium HydroxideDental CementsDrug CombinationsOxidesRoot Canal Filling MaterialsSilicatesBiodentineHydraulic calcium silicate cementProRoot MTAWhite-MTAFlow

Identifiers

PMID32864726
OpenAlexW3081560066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.