ArticleJournal of molecular evolution2020
mPartition: A Model-Based Method for Partitioning Alignments.
Article in Journal of molecular evolution, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- PsiPartition: Improved Site Partitioning for Genomic Data by Parameterized Sorting Indices and Bayesian Optimization.Journal of molecular evolution · 2024Article
- Performance of Akaike Information Criterion and Bayesian Information Criterion in Selecting Partition Models and Mixture Models.Systematic biology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Maximum likelihood (ML) analysis of nucleotide or amino-acid alignments is widely used to infer evolutionary relationships among species. Computing the likelihood of a phylogenetic tree from such alignments is a complicated task because the evolutionary processes typically vary across sites. A number of studies have shown that partitioning alignments into sub-alignments of sites, where each sub-alignment is analyzed using a different model of evolution (e.g., GTR + I + G), is a sensible strategy. Current partitioning methods group sites into subsets based on the inferred rates of evolution at the sites. However, these do not provide sufficient information to adequately reflect the substitution processes of characters at the sites. Moreover, the site rate-based methods group all invariant sites into one subset, potentially resulting in wrong phylogenetic trees. In this study, we propose a partitioning method, called mPartition, that combines not only the evolutionary rates but also substitution models at sites to partition alignments. Analyses of different partitioning methods on both real and simulated datasets showed that mPartition was better than the other partitioning methods tested. Notably, mPartition overcame the pitfall of grouping all invariant sites into one subset. Using mPartition may lead to increased accuracy of ML-based phylogenetic inference, especially for multiple loci or whole genome datasets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32864711What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.