ArticleCurrent opinion in physiology2020
Interpreting temporal dynamics during sensory decision-making.
Article in Current opinion in physiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Utility of Tablet-Based Eye Tracking for Early Screening of Poststroke Cognitive Impairment: Diagnostic Cohort Study.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2026Article
- Article
- Sensory and Choice Responses in MT Distinct from Motion Encoding.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Perceptual decisions are informed by the accumulation of sensory evidence over time, but the form of this fundamental temporal computation is not fully understood. Characterizations of the temporal integration of sensory stimuli in behavior and neural activity are usually conceived with separate stages for sensory encoding and downstream integration for accumulating the sensory evidence. Sensory and decision stages can each have their own temporal dynamics that affect the time course of perception and action. Here, we discuss recent work using temporal signatures of behavior in the context of traditional two-stage models. This discussion highlights shortcomings of two stage sensory/decision frameworks, points towards how modern techniques can provide more realistic characterizations of temporal integration, and in turn motivates a richer philosophical framework for building models of how sensory data might be interpreted by the brain to produce actions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.