Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32864486›Full record

ArticleSpine surgery and related research2020

Impact of Consultation Length on Satisfaction in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain: A Nationwide Multicenter Study in Japan.

Naohisa Miyakoshi, Daisuke Kudo, Yukihiro Matsuyama, Toshihiko Yamashita, Mamoru Kawakami, Kazuhisa Takahashi, Munehito Yoshida, Takashi Kaito, Shiro Imagama, Seiji Ohtori and 15 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Spine surgery and related research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. [Correlation between consultation time and patient´s satisfaction in primary care].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2023
    Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors.

Naohisa MiyakoshiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Akita, Japan.
Daisuke KudoDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Akita, Japan.
Yukihiro MatsuyamaDivision of Orthopedic Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan.
Toshihiko YamashitaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.
Mamoru KawakamiSpine Care Center, Wakayama Medical University Kihoku Hospital, Katsuragi-cho, Japan.
Kazuhisa TakahashiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.
Munehito YoshidaSumiya Orthopaedic Hospital, Wakayama, Japan.
Takashi KaitoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.
Shiro ImagamaDepartment of Orthopaedics/Rheumatology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Seiji OhtoriDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yamaguchi Rosai Hospital, Sanyoonoda, Japan.
Toshihiko TaguchiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yamaguchi Rosai Hospital, Sanyoonoda, Japan.
Hirotaka HaroDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Yamanashi, Chuo, Japan.
Hiroshi TaneichiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Dokkyo Medical University, Mibumachi, Japan.
Masashi YamazakiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
Gen InoueDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Japan.
Kotaro NishidaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of the Ryukyus, Faculty of Medicine, Nishihara, Japan.
Hiroshi YamadaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan.
Daijiro KabataDepartment of Medical Statistics, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine and Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Ayumi ShintaniDepartment of Medical Statistics, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine and Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Motoki IwasakiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Osaka Rosai Hospital, Sakai, Japan.
Manabu ItoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Hospital Organization, Hokkaido Medical Center, Sapporo, Japan.
Hideki MurakamiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Nagoya City University, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.
Kazuo YonenobuOsaka Yukioka College of Health Science, Osaka, Japan.
Tomoyuki TakuraDepartment of Healthcare Economics and Health Policy, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Joji MochidaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Japan Medical Alliance, Ebina General Hospital, Ebina, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionChronic low back pain (CLBP) is a major health burden worldwide and requires patient satisfaction with treatment. Consultation length can be an important factor in patient satisfaction, but few studies have investigated the impact of consultation length on satisfaction in patients with CLBP. This study tried to elucidate the impact of consultation length on clinical outcomes in patients with CLBP.

methodsThis study is part of an analysis using the database of the nationwide, multicenter cohort for CLBP performed by the Project Committee of the Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research. A total of 427 patients aged 20-85 years (median age, 73.0 years; female, 58.6%) with CLBP were prospectively followed-up monthly for 6 months. Multivariable nonlinear regression analyses were performed to assess the effect of consultation length on outcome measures including subjective satisfaction score, EuroQol 5-dimension, Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, JOA Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire, visual analog scale (VAS) and Medical Outcome Survey short-form 8-item health survey that evaluated at the next phase. Furthermore, we assessed whether the effect of consultation length on patient satisfaction was modified by the baseline Brief Scale for Psychiatric Problems in Orthopaedic Patients (BS-POP) score for patient and physician versions.

resultsVAS for CLBP was the only score that correlated significantly with consultation length (P = 0.018). Satisfaction score showed a significant positive correlation with consultation length in patients with the highest baseline BS-POP scores (P < 0.2). Moreover, consultation lengths more than 7.6 min and 15.1 min offered increase of satisfaction if patients show the highest BS-POP scores on patient and physician versions, respectively.

conclusionsThese findings suggest that a sufficiently long consultation is an important factor for subjective satisfaction in the patients with CLBP, particularly in patients with psychological problems.

Indexed as

chronic low back painconsultation lengthpsychiatric problemsatisfaction

Identifiers

PMID32864486
PMCPMC7447350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.