ArticleWellcome open research2020
Ethical challenges in pathogen sequencing: a systematic scoping review.
Article in Wellcome open research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Strategies and Opportunities to Improve Community Health through Advanced Molecular Detection and Genomic Surveillance of Infectious Diseases.Emerging infectious diseases · 2025Article
- National investment case development for pathogen genomics.Cell genomics · 2025Review
- Application of Pathogen Genomics to Outbreak Investigation.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024Article
- Ten common issues with reference sequence databases and how to mitigate them.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2024Review
- Public health use of HIV phylogenetic data in sub-Saharan Africa: ethical issues.BMJ global health · 2023Review
- Integrating genomic and epidemiologic data to accelerate progress toward schistosomiasis elimination.eLife · 2022Review
- Infection prevention and control insights from a decade of pathogen whole-genome sequencing.The Journal of hospital infection · 2022Review
- Defining ethical challenge(s) in healthcare research: a rapid review.BMC medical ethics · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.