ArticleLaryngoscope investigative otolaryngology2020
Outcomes of a novel alloplastic technique for external auditory canal repair in tympanomastoidectomy.
Article in Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Outcomes of a novel alloplastic technique for external auditory canal repair in tympanomastoidectomy.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo analyze surgical outcomes of a novel alloplastic reconstruction technique for partial external auditory canal (EAC) defects in tympanomastoidectomy.
methodsRetrospective study of 51 patients with cholesteatoma who underwent repair of partial EAC defects during tympanomastoidectomy at a tertiary referral center over 8 years. Nineteen patients were treated with a novel alloplastic graft technique using hydroxyapatite cement and bone pâté for EAC repair. Thirty-two patients treated with traditional cartilage repair of the EAC served as a control group. The primary outcomes measured were postoperative cholesteatoma recurrence rates, infection rates, and mean air-bone gap (ABG).
resultsTwenty of the 51 cases (39.2%) were revision surgeries for cholesteatoma recidivism, with a greater proportion of revision surgeries in the alloplastic group (57.9% vs 28.1%,
conclusionsComposite alloplastic and bone pâté reconstruction is an effective technique to repair partial EAC defects in tympanomastoidectomy, with comparable postoperative hearing outcomes and no increased risk of cholesteatoma recurrence or infection compared to traditional cartilage repair. Recidivism rates were relatively high in both groups, likely due to the high rate of revision surgeries and aggressive nature of cholesteatoma within the cohort. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3B.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.