Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32864434›Full record

ReviewLaryngoscope investigative otolaryngology2020

Tissue engineering applications in otolaryngology-The state of translation.

Weston L Niermeyer, Cole Rodman, Michael M Li, Tendy Chiang

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Tissue engineering in otorhinolaryngology: A knowledge-based analysis.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. 3D Bioprinting in Otolaryngology: A Review.Advanced healthcare materials · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Cartilage · 2022
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Regenerative Medicine of Epithelia: Lessons From the Past and Future Goals.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021
    Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Weston L NiermeyerDepartment of Otolaryngology Nationwide Children's Hospital Columbus Ohio USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7580-8731
Cole RodmanThe Ohio State University College of Medicine Columbus Ohio USA.
Michael M LiDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center Columbus Ohio USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0229-7667
Tendy ChiangDepartment of Otolaryngology Nationwide Children's Hospital Columbus Ohio USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1448-5873
Nationwide Children's Hospital · USThe Ohio State University · USThe Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center · US

Funding

Mechanisms of regeneration in tissue engineered tracheal graftsK08HL138460 · NHLBI · RESEARCH INST NATIONWIDE CHILDREN'S HOSP · PI CHIANG, TENDY · 2017 to 2021
$788k
NHLBI NIH HHS K08 HL138460
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While tissue engineering holds significant potential to address current limitations in reconstructive surgery of the head and neck, few constructs have made their way into routine clinical use. In this review, we aim to appraise the state of head and neck tissue engineering over the past five years, with a specific focus on otologic, nasal, craniofacial bone, and laryngotracheal applications. A comprehensive scoping search of the PubMed database was performed and over 2000 article hits were returned with 290 articles included in the final review. These publications have addressed the hallmark characteristics of tissue engineering (cellular source, scaffold, and growth signaling) for head and neck anatomical sites. While there have been promising reports of effective tissue engineered interventions in small groups of human patients, the majority of research remains constrained to in vitro and in vivo studies aimed at furthering the understanding of the biological processes involved in tissue engineering. Further, differences in functional and cosmetic properties of the ear, nose, airway, and craniofacial bone affect the emphasis of investigation at each site. While otolaryngologists currently play a role in tissue engineering translational research, continued multidisciplinary efforts will likely be required to push the state of translation towards tissue-engineered constructs available for routine clinical use. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA.

Indexed as

auricularcraniofacialnasalregenerative medicinetissue engineeringtracheal

Identifiers

PMID32864434
PMCPMC7444782
OpenAlexW3036953343

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.