Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32864430›Full record

ReviewLaryngoscope investigative otolaryngology2020

Antibiotic eluting sinus stents.

Harrison M Thompson, Dong-Jin Lim, Catherine Banks, Jessica W Grayson, Samrath Ayinala, Do-Yeon Cho, Bradford A Woodworth

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Soft Artificial Ciliary Brush with Integrated Haptic Feedback for Efficient Airway Mucus Cleaning.Advanced intelligent systems (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Antibiotic eluting sinus stents.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Harrison M ThompsonDepartment of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery University of Alabama at Birmingham Birmingham Alabama USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7030-6388
Dong-Jin LimDepartment of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery University of Alabama at Birmingham Birmingham Alabama USA.
Catherine BanksPrince of Wales and Sydney Hospitals University of New South Wales Sydney New South Wales Australia.
Jessica W GraysonDepartment of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery University of Alabama at Birmingham Birmingham Alabama USA.
Samrath AyinalaDepartment of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery University of Alabama at Birmingham Birmingham Alabama USA.
Do-Yeon ChoDepartment of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery University of Alabama at Birmingham Birmingham Alabama USA.
Bradford A WoodworthDepartment of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery University of Alabama at Birmingham Birmingham Alabama USA.
University of Alabama at Birmingham · USCystic Fibrosis Foundation · USSydney Hospital · AU

Funding

UAB CF Research and Translation Core CenterP30DK072482 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI Steven Mark Rowe · 2007 to 2026
$23.0M
Ivacaftor for Acquired CFTR Dysfunction in Chronic RhinosinusitisR01HL133006 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI WOODWORTH, BRADFORD ALAN · 2016 to 2020
$1.7M
Dysbiosis of the Sinus Microbiota in Chronic RhinosinusitisK08AI146220 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI CHO, DO-YEON · 2019 to 2021
$467k
Impact of mucin fermenting microbes on the virulence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in chronic rhinosinusitisR21AI168894 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI CHO, DO-YEON · 2022 to 2023
$408k
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL133006NIAID NIH HHS K08 AI146220NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI168894NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK072482
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesChronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a multifactorial disease affecting up to 16% of the United States population and disproportionately affecting the cystic fibrosis (CF) patient population. Despite treating the underlying infection, the use of systemic antibiotics has shown little efficacy in alleviation of symptom burden. This review seeks to discuss recent research on novel antibiotic eluting stent therapy in vitro and within animal models as well as the factors that contribute to its efficacy. DATA SOURCES: PubMed literature review. REVIEW

methodsA review of all published literature related to antibiotic eluting sinus stents was conducted to integrate and summarize this innovative approach to chronic sinus infections.

resultsPlacement of the ciprofloxacin sinus stent (CSS) and ciprofloxacin-ivacaftor sinus stent (CISS) exhibited improvement in endoscopic and radiographic findings in rabbit CRS models. While the CSS showed an overall trend toward improvement in microscopic findings and a reduction in biofilm mass, there remained a significant quantity of planktonic bacteria due to antibiotic depletion from an initial burst release in the first 48 hours of stent placement. The CISS and ciprofloxacin-azithromycin sinus stents (CASSs) exhibited controlled antibiotic release over the study period leading to greatly reduced planktonic bacterial load and biofilm mass. In vitro studies indicate that CASS may be just as efficacious at reducing biofilm mass.

conclusionAntibiotic eluting sinus stents show significant promise as a novel therapeutic strategy for CRS. The CISS may have particular promise for the CF patient population by addressing both the infectious and genetic components of disease. Animal studies demonstrate significant promise for translation into human studies. Human clinical trials are warranted to determine the efficacy of antibiotic sinus stents in human patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA.

Indexed as

antibiotic stentazithromycinbiofilmchronic rhinosinusitisciprofloxacincystic fibrosisivacaftorsinusitissinus stentstent

Identifiers

PMID32864430
PMCPMC7444760
OpenAlexW3041118093

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.