ArticleOsong public health and research perspectives2020
Epidemiological Characteristics of Field Tick-Borne Pathogens in Gwang-ju Metropolitan Area, South Korea, from 2014 to 2018.
Article in Osong public health and research perspectives, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Long-term ecological surveillance of hard ticks (Acari: Ixodidae) and SFTSV in Dangjin, South Korea (2018-2024).Parasites & vectors · 2026Article
- Comparative Genomics of Two Newly Sequenced Rodent-Derived and One Previously Reported Tick-DerivedPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Whole genome sequence and comparative genomic analysis of novel Rickettsia koreansis strain CNH17-7 isolated from human.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2024Article
- Molecular Identification of Spotted Fever Group Rickettsiae in Ticks in the Republic of Korea.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Distribution and pathogen prevalence of field-collected ticks from south-western Korea: a study from 2019 to 2022.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Effective Methods of Estimation of Pathogen Prevalence in Pooled Ticks.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Molecular Detection ofMicroorganisms · 2022Article
- Molecular Identification ofInsects · 2021Article
- iSeq 100 for metagenomic pathogen screening in ticks.Parasites & vectors · 2021Article
- Molecular Detection and Phylogeny of Tick-Borne Pathogens in Ticks Collected from Dogs in the Republic of Korea.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe importance of tick-borne diseases is increasing because of climate change, with a lack of long-term studies on tick-borne pathogens in South Korea. To understand the epidemiological characteristics of tick-borne diseases, the monthly distribution of field ticks throughout the year was studied in South Korea between May 2014 and April 2018 in a cross sectional study.
methodsThe presence of various tick-borne pathogens (
resultsDuring the study period there were 11,717 ticks collected and 4 species identified.
conclusionIn conclusion, due attention should be paid to preventing tick-borne infections in humans whilst engaged in outdoor activities in Spring and Autumn, particularly in places where there is a high prevalence of ticks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.