Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32863979›Full record

ArticleStatistics in biosciences2019

Differentiating Between Walking and Stair Climbing Using Raw Accelerometry Data.

William F Fadel, Jacek K Urbanek, Steven R Albertson, Xiaochun Li, Andrea K Chomistek, Jaroslaw Harezlak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in biosciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Walking fingerprinting.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C, Applied statistics · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

William F Fadel410 West 10th Street, Suite 3000, Indianapolis, IN 46202, Department of Biostatistics, School of Medicine & Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health, Indiana University.
Jacek K Urbanek2024 E. Monument Street, Suite 2-700, Baltimore, MD 21205, Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University.
Steven R Albertson723 W. Michigan St., SL280, Indianapolis, IN 46202, Department of Computer and Information Science, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis.
Xiaochun Li410 West 10th Street, Suite 3000, Indianapolis, IN 46202, Department of Biostatistics, School of Medicine & Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health, Indiana University.
Andrea K Chomistek1025 E. 7th Street, Bloomington, IN 47405, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Indiana University Bloomington.
Jaroslaw Harezlak1025 E. 7th Street, Suite C107, Bloomington, IN 47405, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Indiana University Bloomington.

Funding

Indiana Clinical and Translational Sciences InstituteUL1TR001108 · NCATS · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI DENNE, SCOTT C., SHEKHAR, ANANTHA · 2013 to 2017
$23.3M
Statistical models for multi-modal brain imaging studies of HIV-associated cognitive declineR01MH108467 · NIMH · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI HAREZLAK, JAROSLAW · 2015 to 2019
$2.0M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001108NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH108467
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wearable accelerometers provide an objective measure of human physical activity. They record high frequency unlabeled three-dimensional time series data. We extract meaningful features from the raw accelerometry data and based on them develop and evaluate a classification method for the detection of walking and its sub-classes, i.e. level walking, descending stairs and ascending stairs. Our methodology is tested on a sample of 32 middle-aged subjects for whom we extracted features based on the Fourier and wavelet transforms. We build subject-specific and group-level classification models utilizing a tree-based methodology. We evaluate the effects of sensor location and tuning parameters on the classification accuracy of the tree models. In the group-level classification setting, we propose a robust feature inter-subject normalization and evaluate its performance compared to unnormalized data. The overall classification accuracy for the three activities at the subject-specific level was on average 87.6%, with the ankle-worn accelerometers showing the best performance with an average accuracy 90.5%. At the group-level, the average overall classification accuracy for the three activities using the normalized features was 80.2% compared to 72.3% for the unnormalized features. In summary, a framework is provided for better use and feature extraction from raw accelerometry data to differentiate among different walking modalities as well as considerations for study design.

Indexed as

AccelerometerClassification TreesPhysical activitySignal processingWalking

Identifiers

PMID32863979
PMCPMC7453603

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.