Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32863892›Full record

ReviewAgronomy for sustainable development2020

Data synthesis for crop variety evaluation. A review.

David Brown, Inge Van den Bergh, Sytze de Bruin, Lewis Machida, Jacob van Etten

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Agronomy for sustainable development, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Optimizing resource allocation inFrontiers in plant science · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Data-driven approaches can harness crop diversity to address heterogeneous needs for breeding products.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

David BrownLaboratory of Geo-Information Science and Remote Sensing, Wageningen University & Research, Droevendaalsesteeg 3, 6708 PB Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2859-1618
Inge Van den BerghBioversity International, C/O KU Leuven, W. De Croylaan 42, P.O. Box 2455, 3001 Leuven, Belgium.
Sytze de BruinLaboratory of Geo-Information Science and Remote Sensing, Wageningen University & Research, Droevendaalsesteeg 3, 6708 PB Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Lewis MachidaBioversity International, C/O International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA), Nelson Mandela African Institute of Science and Technology, P.O. Box 447, Arusha, Tanzania.
Jacob van EttenBioversity International, Turrialba, 30501 Costa Rica.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Crop varieties should fulfill multiple requirements, including agronomic performance and product quality. Variety evaluations depend on data generated from field trials and sensory analyses, performed with different levels of participation from farmers and consumers. Such multi-faceted variety evaluation is expensive and time-consuming; hence, any use of these data should be optimized. Data synthesis can help to take advantage of existing and new data, combining data from different sources and combining it with expert knowledge to produce new information and understanding that supports decision-making. Data synthesis for crop variety evaluation can partly build on extant experiences and methods, but it also requires methodological innovation. We review the elements required to achieve data synthesis for crop variety evaluation, including (1) data types required for crop variety evaluation, (2) main challenges in data management and integration, (3) main global initiatives aiming to solve those challenges, (4) current statistical approaches to combine data for crop variety evaluation and (5) existing data synthesis methods used in evaluation of varieties to combine different datasets from multiple data sources. We conclude that currently available methods have the potential to overcome existing barriers to data synthesis and could set in motion a virtuous cycle that will encourage researchers to share data and collaborate on data-driven research.

Indexed as

Data-driven decision-makingData repurposingEnvironmental dataFarmers’ preferencesMeta-analysisMulti-environment trialsOn-farm trials

Identifiers

PMID32863892
PMCPMC7440334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.