Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32863855›Full record

ArticleBiomedical signal processing and control2020

Semi-supervised Training Data Selection Improves Seizure Forecasting in Canines with Epilepsy.

Mona Nasseri, Vaclav Kremen, Petr Nejedly, Inyong Kim, Su-Youne Chang, Hang Joon Jo, Hari Guragain, Nathaniel Nelson, Edward Patterson, Beverly K Sturges and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical signal processing and control, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Dogs as a Natural Animal Model of Epilepsy.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Mona NasseriMayo Systems Electrophysiology Laboratory, Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Vaclav KremenMayo Systems Electrophysiology Laboratory, Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Petr NejedlyMayo Systems Electrophysiology Laboratory, Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Inyong KimMayo Systems Electrophysiology Laboratory, Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Su-Youne ChangDepartment of Physiology and Biomedical Engineering, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Hang Joon JoMayo Systems Electrophysiology Laboratory, Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Hari GuragainMayo Systems Electrophysiology Laboratory, Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Nathaniel NelsonMayo Systems Electrophysiology Laboratory, Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Edward PattersonDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, University of Minnesota College of Veterinary Medicine, St. Paul, MN, USA.
Beverly K SturgesVeterinary Medical Teaching Hospital, University of California at Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Chelsea M CroweVeterinary Medical Teaching Hospital, University of California at Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Tim DenisonInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7DQ, UK.
Benjamin H BrinkmannMayo Systems Electrophysiology Laboratory, Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Gregory A WorrellMayo Systems Electrophysiology Laboratory, Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

Funding

THE PGRN/TDP-43 AXIS IN ALZHEIMER?S DISEASE AND NEURODEGENERATIONP50AG016574 · NIA · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI PETERSEN, RONALD C · 1999 to 2018
$36.9M
Reliable Seizure Prediction Using Physiological Signals and Machine LearningR01NS092882 · NINDS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Gregory A Worrell · 2015 to 2026
$5.7M
Neurophysiologically Based Brain State Tracking & Modulation in Focal EpilepsyUH2NS095495 · NINDS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI WORRELL, GREGORY A · 2015 to 2018
$4.2M
Neurophysiologically Based Brain State Tracking & Modulation in Focal EpilepsyUH3NS095495 · NINDS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI WORRELL, GREGORY A · 2019 to 2021
$2.8M
Microscale EEG interictal dynamics & transition into seizure in humans & animalsR01NS078136 · NINDS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI STEAD, SQUIRE MATT · 2012 to 2016
$1.7M
Microseizures, Ultra-slow & High Frequency Oscillations: Biomarkers of epilepsyR01NS063039 · NINDS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI WORRELL, GREGORY A · 2009 to 2013
$1.5M
NIA NIH HHS P50 AG016574NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS063039NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS078136NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS092882NINDS NIH HHS UH2 NS095495NINDS NIH HHS UH3 NS095495
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveConventional selection of pre-ictal EEG epochs for seizure prediction algorithm training data typically assumes a continuous pre-ictal brain state preceding a seizure. This is carried out by defining a fixed duration, pre-ictal time period before seizures from which pre-ictal training data epochs are uniformly sampled. However, stochastic physiological and pathological fluctuations in EEG data characteristics and underlying brain states suggest that pre-ictal state dynamics may be more complex, and selection of pre-ictal training data segments to reflect this could improve algorithm performance.

methodsWe propose a semi-supervised technique to select pre-ictal training data most distinguishable from interictal EEG according to pre-specified data characteristics. The proposed method uses hierarchical clustering to identify optimal pre-ictal data epochs.

resultsIn this paper we compare the performance of a seizure forecasting algorithm with and without hierarchical clustering of pre-ictal periods in chronic iEEG recordings from six canines with naturally occurring epilepsy. Hierarchical clustering of training data improved results for Time In Warning (TIW) (0.18 vs. 0.23) and False Positive Rate (FPR) (0.5 vs. 0.59) when evaluated across all subjects (p<0.001, n=6). Results were mixed when evaluating TIW, FPR, and Sensitivity for individual dogs.

conclusionHierarchical clustering is a helpful method for training data selection overall, but should be evaluated on a subject-wise basis. SIGNIFICANCE: The clustering method can be used to optimize results of forecasting towards sensitivity or TIW or FPR, and therefore can be useful for epilepsy management.

Indexed as

Hierarchical clusteringMachine learningSeizure forecasting

Identifiers

PMID32863855
PMCPMC7450725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.