Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32863655›Full record

ArticleAnnals of pediatric cardiology

Electrocardiogram interpretation among pediatricians: Assessing knowledge, attitudes, and practice.

Mohammad A Ebrahim, Reem K Alseid, Raghad T Aleinati, Volkan Tuzcu

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of pediatric cardiology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Navigating inhabited institutionalism: A framework for electrocardiogram workshops in teaching hospitals.African journal of emergency medicine : Revue africaine de la medecine d'urgence · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. EKG Acquisition Curriculum for Pediatric Trainees.Journal of medical education and curricular development
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Mohammad A EbrahimDepartment of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Kuwait University, Jabriya, Kuwait.
Reem K AlseidDepartment of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Kuwait University, Jabriya, Kuwait.
Raghad T AleinatiDepartment of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Kuwait University, Jabriya, Kuwait.
Volkan TuzcuSidra Medicine, Heart Center, Doha, Qatar.
Kuwait University · KWIstanbul Medipol University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study assesses the competency of pediatricians in interpreting electrocardiograms (ECGs).

methodsA cross-sectional study involving 125 pediatricians comprised of 71 general pediatricians, 15 pediatric cardiologists, and 39 other subspecialists recruited from all public hospitals and two specialty centers. Participants completed a questionnaire that included 10 ECGs and questions regarding backgrounds, attitudes, and practices. The ECGs were graded to obtain a knowledge score out of 30 points. Mann-Whitney U test and Kruskal-Wallis test with post hoc analysis and Bonferroni adjustment were used to compare groups.

resultsThe mean knowledge score ranged from 47.7% to 69.7% among various pediatric specialties (

conclusionsPediatricians recognize the importance of ECGs. However, their skill and level of accuracy at interpretation is suboptimal, including cardiologists, and may affect patient care. Thus, efforts should be made to improve ECG understanding to provide better service to patients.

Indexed as

Electrocardiograminterpretationpediatric cardiologistspediatrician

Identifiers

PMID32863655
PMCPMC7437623
OpenAlexW3039432260

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.