Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32863635›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine2020

Simulation Training in Hemodynamic Monitoring and Mechanical Ventilation: An Assessment of Physician's Performance.

Amarja A Havaldar, Bhuvana Krishna, Sriram Sampath, Saravana K Paramasivam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Simulation Benefits Both the Teacher and the Taught.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Amarja A HavaldarDepartment of Critical Care, St. John's Medical College, Koramangala, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Bhuvana KrishnaDepartment of Critical Care, St. John's Medical College, Koramangala, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Sriram SampathDepartment of Critical Care, St. John's Medical College, Koramangala, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Saravana K ParamasivamDepartment of Critical Care, Kauvery Hospital, Tiruchirappalli, Tamil Nadu, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSimulation is to imitate or replicate real-life scenarios in order to improve cognitive, diagnostic and therapeutic skills. An ideal model should be good enough to output realistic clinical scenarios and respond to interventions done by trainees in real time. Use of simulation-based training has been tried in various fields of medicine. The aim of our study was to prospectively evaluate the effectiveness of simulation model "CRITICA"™ (MEDUPLAY systems) in training critical care physicians. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe advanced intensive care unit (ICU) simulator "CRITICA"™ (MEDUPLAY systems) was developed as a joint collaboration between the Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru and St John's Medical College, Bengaluru. Two-day workshop was conducted. Intensive didactic and case-based scenarios were simulated to formally teach principles of advanced ICU scenarios. The physicians were tested on clinical scenarios in hemodynamic monitoring and mechanical ventilation displayed on the simulator. Assessment of the analytical thinking and pattern recognition ability was carried out before and after the display of the scenarios. Pre- and posttest scores were collected.

resultsThe postsimulation test scores were higher than pretest scores and were statistically significant in hemodynamic monitoring and mechanical ventilation module. [Hemodynamic monitoring pre- and posttest scores 4.41 (2.06) vs 5.23 (2.22)

conclusionSimulator-based training in hemodynamic monitoring and mechanical ventilation was effective. Comparison of routine classroom teaching and simulator-based training needs to be evaluated prospectively. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Havaldar AA, Krishna B, Sampath S, Paramasivam SK. Simulation Training in Hemodynamic Monitoring and Mechanical Ventilation: An Assessment of Physician's Performance. Indian J Crit Care Med 2020;24(6):423-428.

Indexed as

Hemodynamic monitoringMechanical ventilationSimulationTraining

Identifiers

PMID32863635
PMCPMC7435101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.