Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32863631›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine2020

Effects of Delayed Initiation of End-of-life Care in Terminally Ill Intensive Care Unit Patients.

Anirban H Choudhuri, Ankit Sharma, Rajeev Uppal

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Visiting and Communication Policy in Intensive Care Units during COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-sectional Survey from South Asia and the Middle East.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. End-of-life Care in the Intensive Care Unit: Better Late Than Never?Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anirban H ChoudhuriDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Govind Ballabh Pant Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, New Delhi, India.
Ankit SharmaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Govind Ballabh Pant Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, New Delhi, India.
Rajeev UppalDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Govind Ballabh Pant Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, New Delhi, India.
Govind Ballabh Pant Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEarly initiation of end-of-life (EOL) care in terminally ill patients can reduce the administration of unnecessary medications, minimize laboratory and radiological investigations, and avoid procedures that can provoke untoward complications without substantial benefits. This retrospective observational study was performed to compare early vs late initiation of EOL care in terminally ill ICU patients after the recognition of treatment futility. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe medical records of all patients who were considered to be terminally ill any time after ICU admission between January 2014 and December 2018 were extracted from the ICU database. The patients who were recognized for treatment futility were eligible for inclusion. The patients who were already on EOL care prior to the ICU admission or whose diagnosis was unconfirmed were excluded from the study. The treatment futility was a subjective decision jointly undertaken by the primary physician and the intensivist based upon the disease stage and the available therapeutic options. The commencement of EOL care after recognition of treatment futility was divided into (a) early group (EG)-within 48 hours of decision of treatment futility and (b) late group (LG)-after 48 hours of recognition of treatment futility. Both the groups were compared for (a) ICU mortality, (b) length of ICU stay, (c) number of antibiotic-free days, (d) number of ventilator-free days, (e) number of medical and/or surgical interventions (insertion of central lines, drains, IABP, etc.), (f) number of blood and radiological investigations, and (g) satisfaction level of family members.

resultsOut of 107 terminally ill patients with diagnosis of treatment futility, 64 patients (59.8%) underwent early initiation of EOL against delayed initiation in 43 (40.2%) patients (1.3 ± 0.4 days vs 5.1 ± 1.6 days;

conclusionWe conclude that delayed initiation of EOL care in terminally ill ICU patients after recognition of treatment futility can increase the antibiotic usage and medical and/or surgical interventions with no effect on the satisfaction level of the family members. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Choudhuri AH, Sharma A, Uppal R. Effects of Delayed Initiation of End-of-life Care in Terminally Ill Intensive Care Unit Patients. Indian J Crit Care Med 2020;24(6):404-408.

Indexed as

Do not activate cardiopulmonary resuscitationEnd-of-life careEthical issues

Identifiers

PMID32863631
PMCPMC7435104
OpenAlexW3046760931

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.