Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32863561›Full record

ArticleJournal of rural studies2020

Smart rural futures: Will rural areas be left behind in the 4th industrial revolution?

Paul Cowie, Leanne Townsend, Koen Salemink

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of rural studies, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Cultivating the Field of Rural Health Research: The Case for Rural Health Research Competencies.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. A scoping review and expert consensus on digital determinants of health.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Spatial Patterns and Drivers of SME Digitalisation.Journal of the knowledge economy · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Paul CowieCentre for Rural Economy, Newcastle University NE1 7RU, UK.
Leanne TownsendSocial, Economic and Geographical Sciences (SEGS), James Hutton Institute, Craigiebuckler, Aberdeen, AB15 8QH, UK.
Koen SaleminkDepartment of Cultural Geography, Faculty of Spatial Sciences, University of Groningen, 9700, AB Groningen, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The 4th Industrial Revolution (4IR) is the term given to encompass a range of technological developments that many argue will fundamentally change society, much in the same way that electricity and digital technology did during previous industrial revolutions. This paper argues that current debates around 4IR are centred on the urban core, with rural areas being relegated to the peripherality and the remainder. The paper therefore examines these technologies from a rural perspective and considers what impact they could have in rural areas, both positive and negative. The analysis shows that the impacts of 4IR technologies could be just as important in rural as in urban places. Drawing on extant theories of rural development, the paper examines the physical and cultural barriers facing rural areas when attempting to engage with 4IR. The paper concludes by proposing that rural theorists engage with smart urban theoretical debates. New research should seek to understand the multi-faceted aspects of 4IR in rural regions, and to support the transition to smart rural futures.

Indexed as

DigitalisationFourth industrial revolutionResponsible research and innovationResponsible rural research and innovationSmart citiesSmart rural

Identifiers

PMID32863561
PMCPMC7443211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.