Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32863537›Full record

ArticleJournal of magnetism and magnetic materials2019

Single cell magnetometry by magnetophoresis vs. bulk cell suspension magnetometry by SQUID-MPMS - a comparison.

Wei Xue, Lee R Moore, Naruhiko Nakano, Jeffrey J Chalmers, Maciej Zborowski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of magnetism and magnetic materials, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Wei XueDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, OH 44195, United States.
Lee R MooreDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, OH 44195, United States.
Naruhiko NakanoDepartment of Chemistry for Materials, Mie University, Mie, Japan.
Jeffrey J ChalmersThe William G. Lowrie Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, the Ohio State University, 151 W. Woodruff Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210.
Maciej ZborowskiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, OH 44195, United States.

Funding

Magnetophoretic Cell Sorting and AnalysisR01CA062349 · NCI · CLEVELAND CLINIC LERNER COM-CWRU · PI ZBOROWSKI, MACIEJ · 1994 to 2015
$5.5M
Fractionation of Aged RBCs Based on Hemoglobin ContentR01HL131720 · NHLBI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI CHALMERS, JEFFREY JOHN, PALMER, ANDRE FRANCIS · 2017 to 2020
$2.7M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA062349NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL131720
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Paramagnetic constituents of a cell have strong effect on cell's volume magnetic susceptibility even at low volume fraction because of their high susceptibility relative to that of the diamagnetic cell constituents. The effect can be measured at a single cell level by measuring cell terminal velocity in viscous media using a microscope equipped with a well-defined field and gradient magnet configuration (referred to as magnetophoretic analysis by cell tracking velocimetry, CTV). The sensitivity of such a microscopic-scale magnetometry was compared to that of a reference method of superconducting quantum interference-magnetic properties measurement system (SQUID-MPMS) using a red blood cell (RBC) suspension model. The RBC hemoglobin oxygen saturation determines the hemoglobin molecular magnetic susceptibility (diamagnetic when fully oxygenated, paramagnetic when fully deoxygenated or converted to methemoglobin). The SQUID-MPMS measurements were performed on an average of 5,000 RBCs in 20 μL physiological phosphate buffer at room temperature, those by CTV on a single cell track in a mean magnetic field of 1.6 T and mean gradient of 240 T/m, repeated for an average of 1,000 tracks per sample. This suggests 5,000× higher sensitivity of cell susceptometry by magnetophoretic analysis than by SQUID-MPMS. The magnetophoretic mean RBC magnetic susceptibilities were in the range determined by SQUID-MPMS (lower limit) and theory (upper limit). The ability of magnetophoretic analysis to resolve susceptibility peaks in a mixed cell populations was confirmed for an oxy RBC and met RBC mixture. Magnetophoretic analysis by CTV provides new tool for studies of emergence of paramagnetic reaction products in the cell.

Identifiers

PMID32863537
PMCPMC7453790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.