Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32863456›Full record

ArticleComputer methods in applied mechanics and engineering2020

Propagation of uncertainty in the mechanical and biological response of growing tissues using multi-fidelity Gaussian process regression.

Taeksang Lee, Ilias Bilionis, Adrian Buganza Tepole

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computer methods in applied mechanics and engineering, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Bayesian Inference Framework to Identify Skin Material PropertiesbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Multiscale modeling meets machine learning: What can we learn?Archives of computational methods in engineering : state of the art reviews · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Taeksang LeeSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.
Ilias BilionisSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.
Adrian Buganza TepoleSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.
Purdue University West Lafayette · US

Funding

Multi-Scale Modeling to Predict Long-Term Growth and Remodeling of Skin in Response to StretchR01AR074525 · NIAMS · PURDUE UNIVERSITY · PI BUGANZA TEPOLE, ADRIAN · 2019 to 2023
$2.7M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR074525
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A key feature of living tissues is their capacity to remodel and grow in response to environmental cues. Within continuum mechanics, this process can be captured with the multiplicative split of the deformation gradient into growth and elastic contributions. The mechanical and biological response during tissue adaptation is characterized by inherent variability. Accounting for this uncertainty is critical to better understand tissue mechanobiology, and, moreover, it is of practical importance if we aim to develop predictive models for clinical use. However, the current gold standard in computational models of growth and remodeling remains the use of deterministic finite element (FE) simulations. Here we focus on tissue expansion, a popular technique in which skin is stretched by a balloon-like device inducing its growth. We construct FE models of tissue expansion with various levels of detail, and show that a sufficiently broad set of FE simulations from these models can be used to train an accurate and efficient multi-fidelity Gaussian process (GP) surrogate. The approach is not limited to simulation data, rather, it can fuse different kinds of data, including from experiments. The main appeal of the framework relies on the common experience that highly detailed models (or experiments) are more accurate but also more costly, while simpler models (or experiments) can be easily evaluated but are bound to have some error. In these situations, doing uncertainty analysis tasks with the high fidelity models alone is not feasible and, conversely, relying solely on low fidelity approximations is also undesirable. We show that a multi-fidelity GP outperforms the high fidelity GP and low fidelity GP when tested against the most detailed FE model. In turn, having trained the multi-fidelity GP model, we showcase the propagation of uncertainty from the mechanical and biological response parameters to the spatio-temporal growth outcomes. We expect that the methods and applications in this paper will enable future research in parameter calibration under uncertainty and uncertainty propagation in real clinical scenarios involving tissue growth and remodeling.

Indexed as

Machine learningSkin mechanicsTissue expansionTissue mechanicsUncertainty analysis

Identifiers

PMID32863456
PMCPMC7453758
OpenAlexW2994789389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.