Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32863454›Full record

ArticleComputer methods in applied mechanics and engineering2019

Machine learning in drug development: Characterizing the effect of 30 drugs on the QT interval using Gaussian process regression, sensitivity analysis, and uncertainty quantification.

Francisco Sahli Costabal, Kristen Matsuno, Jiang Yao, Paris Perdikaris, Ellen Kuhl

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computer methods in applied mechanics and engineering, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
10.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 100 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Full-field surrogate modeling of cardiac electrophysiology encoding geometric variability.Computer methods in applied mechanics and engineering · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Drug Treatment Effect Model Based on MODWT and Hawkes Self-Exciting Point Process.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Francisco Sahli CostabalDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Kristen MatsunoDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Jiang YaoDassault Systèmes Simulia Corporation, Johnston, RI 02919, USA.
Paris PerdikarisMechanical Engineering and Applied Mechanics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Ellen KuhlDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Stanford University · USDassault Systèmes (United States) · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Multi-Scale Laws of Myocardial Growth and RemodelingU01HL119578 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI GUCCIONE, JULIUS MATTEO, KASSAB, GHASSAN S · 2014 to 2018
$3.8M
NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL119578
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prolonged QT intervals are a major risk factor for ventricular arrhythmias and a leading cause of sudden cardiac death. Various drugs are known to trigger QT interval prolongation and increase the proarrhythmic potential. Yet, how precisely the action of drugs on the cellular level translates into QT interval prolongation on the whole organ level remains insufficiently understood. Here we use machine learning techniques to systematically characterize the effect of 30 common drugs on the QT interval. We combine information from high fidelity three-dimensional human heart simulations with low fidelity one-dimensional cable simulations to build a surrogate model for the QT interval using multi-fidelity Gaussian process regression. Once trained and cross-validated, we apply our surrogate model to perform sensitivity analysis and uncertainty quantification. Our sensitivity analysis suggests that compounds that block the rapid delayed rectifier potassium current

Indexed as

Cardiac electrophysiologyDrug developmentFinite element analysisGaussian process regressionMachine learningSensitivity analysisTorsades de pointesUncertainty quantification

Identifiers

PMID32863454
PMCPMC7454226
OpenAlexW2912518841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.