ArticleInformation sciences2019
Multi-View Cluster Analysis with Incomplete Data to Understand Treatment Effects.
Article in Information sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Survey on Multi-View Clustering.IEEE transactions on artificial intelligence · 2021Article
- Enhancing web search result clustering model based on multiview multirepresentation consensus cluster ensemble (mmcc) approach.PloS one · 2021Article
- VIEEE transactions on artificial intelligence · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Multi-view cluster analysis, as a popular granular computing method, aims to partition sample subjects into consistent clusters across different views in which the subjects are characterized. Frequently, data entries can be missing from some of the views. The latest multi-view co-clustering methods cannot effectively deal with incomplete data, especially when there are mixed patterns of missing values. We propose an enhanced formulation for a family of multi-view co-clustering methods to cope with the missing data problem by introducing an indicator matrix whose elements indicate which data entries are observed and assessing cluster validity only on observed entries. In comparison with the simple strategy of removing subjects with missing values, our approach can use all available data in cluster analysis. In comparison with common methods that impute missing data in order to use regular multi-view analytics, our approach is less sensitive to imputation uncertainty. In comparison with other state-of-the-art multi-view incomplete clustering methods, our approach is sensible in the cases of missing any value in a view or missing the entire view, the most common scenario in practice. We first validated the proposed strategy in simulations, and then applied it to a treatment study of heroin dependence which would have been impossible with previous methods due to a number of missing-data patterns. Patients in a treatment study were naturally assessed in different feature spaces such as in the pre-, during-and post-treatment time windows. Our algorithm was able to identify subgroups where patients in each group showed similarities in all of the three time windows, thus leading to the recognition of pre-treatment (baseline) features predictive of post-treatment outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.